[url=http://www.funrestarea.com/pages/camel_toe.shtmlStill my favourite interweb video[/url

Well my favourite legal one at least

in answer to the opening post, I don't think he would come to Leeds as a backup to 7&9, and he wasn't available 12 months ago when we signed Buderus.

He does seem a player that is very up and down. he was key to the Hull team in 2005, but was out of Hull quite soon afterwards.

Looks like a t!t too

He's been at a few clubs in a relatively short space of time, which often tells you enough about the person, rather than the player.

Decent enough player, but I don't see the point in splashing the cash on him, as I don't think he offers cover in positions we're even remotely weak

McClennan obviosuly felt differently.

EmmaMur01 would love Danny Brough to play for Leeds.

???

Am I missing something there?

He signed a hooker? Buderus!

wouldn't want him at leeds, he is a disruptive influence in the dressing room, hence his depature from hull. he has decent kicking game but certainly no better than anything we already have at leeds

Ah right, with you.

My comment was based on the fact he was a potential sigining, i.e. adding to the squad with Buderus already in it. If we hadn't have signed Buderus then he could have been an option, but even then I don't think he'd have come to Leeds as a back-up.

I feel for yer mate

No photoshop required on that barnet.

No way!!!! His forehead would get stuck in the tunnel.

Yes Brough going to Saints nailed on, heard that of his dad

Did you hear of his Dad when this is going to happen?

I really dislike the bloke.

So when will it happen then?...

They were trying to take him a month or two ago, but he got injured plus stains did not have cap space to pay what he wanted, but it is done for next season. 100%

He was meant to go to Saints for this season but deal fell through when he was at world cup

Would have been a strange one really how would they have used him?...

Stand Off: Leon Pryce
Scrum Half: Sean Long
Hooker/Interchange Hooker: Keiron Cunningham/James Roby

Unless it would have been something like:

Full Back: Leon Pryce
Stand Off: Danny Brough
Scrum Half: Sean Long
Hooker/Interchange Hooker: Keiron Cunningham/James Roby
Loose Forward: Paul Wellens

Think it was based around Long winding down, apparently stains feel that after Long is done, they dont see Eastmond as a replacement who can boss a game, and see him more as an impact player so the story goes. I have seen eastmond a few times and he is a good impact player, but lacks a kicking game so it does maybe explain

im sceptical of this.

I suspect ex Leeds player Mcdermott is trying to do a bit of psychological unsettling of Saints young players.

With Matty Smith, Kyle Eastmond, Gary Wheeler and Jonny Lomax we are not short of young halves who already have first grade experience.
Add in Scott Moore who is an ex halfback and also Jamie Ellis in the academy and you can see that halfback is not a weak area for Saints.

Leon Pryce disappeared just before last years GF and still didn't return for the WC so Saints tried getting Danny Brough to replace him but he got injured. Now Leon has finally returned Saints have put the deal off until the end of the season but they will use Brough to give Longy a rest throughout the season and for when Leon disappears again, probably around october time.

Actually there is a good chance Leon will be disappearing some time the end of April (after sentencing).

That is the veiw of some, however, I think its incorrect.

Eastmond has had a fair bit of first team action, but very little of it has been at 7, where he can stand at first receiver. Some Saints fans say "he's too similar a player to pryce", but imo all this is really based upon is the fact he has alot of pace. He's filled in at full back, 5/8, centre and a bit of hooker, and done them all well enough, but I don't think we've seen what he's all about in terms of his natural half back game.
I also think it false to say he hasn't got a kicking game.

His main problem at the moment seems to be that he's a little fragile. He is tiny, did Rob Burrow struggle when he was a teenager?

Apart from the obvious off-field antics, is this such a bad thing?

I think that they assume he's more of a running player like pryce, rather than a distributor/organiser like Long, and perhaps you really need one of each to make a hlaf back partnership work.

As I stated though, I think their wrong to make this judgement.