Quote ="Gallanteer"Confirm that I'm not allowed to have an opinion based on the limited evidence available to me? The evidence may be limited or weak but that doesn't stop you having an opinion.
Anyway, welham was OK and loved to intercept the ball. The fact that his success rate at doing so was low and left gaping holes in the line was his undoing. I guess this hasn't changed whilst at Bradford. Thornley wasn't the player we expected him to be (based on what I saw of him on the pitch).
Minns isn't perfect, but better than both of them. Wether that continues this season, we can only hope.'"
We all have opinions and express them, some even based on limited evidence. You however appear to have based your opinion about Thornley being paid a ridiculous amount on no actual evidence at all.
