There seems to be something in the rules under the "Ongoing Assessment of a Club’s Aggregate Liability" section.



With one of the examples shown here




Again it is at the discretion of the RSCM. I seriously hope we as a club are not hedging our bets on the RFL being sympathetic to our cause. Also do we want to be seen as the club that will get rid of players pretty quickly. It has 2 effecs on the club.
1, Players can come for an easy payday know if they fail to perform they will be hoofed out with a nice settlement.
2, Players will not want to come with the pressure of knowing the club have a habit of binning players who do not fit in.

Either there is some substance in the Craig Hall to FC rumour !!!
Or Radford doesn't think miller is simply not good enough !!

In regards to not playing miller due to cap reasons then why did Radders take the risk of have him 18th man a couple of times this season when 1 late injury and then he has to play ?

You could well be right.

It just seems that the signing of players would have an additional hurdle to jump, which at worst would delay the signing for a number of days.

Yesterday, Houghtons distribution was slow, inaccurate and readable. Heremaia offers more there at the moment in terms of speed and metres. Putting him at 7 is just unnecessary. We have to at least give Rankin and Miller a chance there. His defence cannot be as bad as Ben Crooks at the moment. Lets face it, Dobson's defence was woeful for Rovers and he was their mojo and won them games. Millers sat in the stand on his 3DS. If he's never going to play, send him back.
I just hope Radfords not going to persist with Horne there.
If the rumours about Shauls injury are true, get him at fullback where he is more effective and away from putting his boot onto a ball.

give the kid ago, imo not as bad as some make out,

What Shaul injury!?

Bruised ego!?

Ah, the old recurring one.

Rumoured leg injury. A player tweeted this and it was removed very very quickly.

Super

Miller's not being played because of a pre-season, training ground bust up with Arundel

Well he can't play if they've removed one of his legs.

I knew there was a perfectly good reason for him not playing after all.

I heard shaul didn't play because his training all week wasn't upto standard . What ever that means .

Thought it was Westerman and Miller scrapping

That was in the pub apparently, not the training ground. Maybe Miller will get picked once he's fought the rest of the squad.

did you have a coat?

Has McDonnell actually been paid off yet? Wondering if Miller might get the boot instead. Still an option whilst neither has taken the field yet.

He's injured, we are not allowed to ask. It's in the press.....

miller wea scrapping with lineham, no it was ellis, hold on it was tuson, no think it was whiting, hold on it was all of them,

Does any of that say if a player leaves the club without playing a game?

I couldn't find anything - Let's hope Motu knows the answer.

Seems Miller was good enough to play rep rugby for his age, but not good enough for a below average super league team.
As for not being able to tackle, I take it we'd not want to sign Dobson if he ever became available again?!.

I watched back a few games which Miller played in recently off and I didn't see any massive defensive deficiencies. While his long kicking game isn't great, he can attack the line and brings a running and passing threat and backs up.

I didn't think there was any lack of effort Sunday, just lack of direction, mystifying team selection and Agar like bench management but one thing Radford did say is that changes will be made. This is one obvious change that HAS to be made.

Can't remember which one, but one of the Humberside lot said that while there was no lack of physical effort, there was a distinct lack of mental effort. I tend to agree with him.