Quote ="Paul Youane"As I understand it Super League clubs have until today to confirm which non-Super League clubs they are going to formally link with and utilise as a playing base for any over 19 age-group players to get experience however the Championship clubs don't meet until next week to vote on acceptance of the RFL's proposals for re-structuring academy and scholarship rugby. I not sure that reference to playing at u23 level with these teams are correct.
Cost cutting behind it all with I believe just ourselves and St Helens opposing the proposals from the start. RFL have introduced the u19s as this will fit with a centralised three year "sports excellence apprenticeship" that would be funded by central government hence saving clubs having to pay youngsters direct. I wonder how Stevie Ward would have thought about being paid YTS wages for playing at Wembley last week and having to follow a curriculum set by central government?
I doubt we will get involved with the apprenticeship scheme instead deciding to stick with the youth development systems we have invested in heavily in recent years. We want our best youngsters training within the full-time environment alongside the first team squad.'"
That is very helpful in providing some explanation behind the changes.Saints have always had a great youth system so I am not surprised they are against this move, but I am surprised Wigan and Leeds have agreed. If we continued to 'do our own thing' I can imagine there could be difficulties arranging matches against suitable opposition, but it is encouraging to hear we will retain the excellent systems we have in place at Wire.
Altering the current set up to chase low levels of government funding, and reducing the number of age groups appears to be a 'race to the bottom' as far as RFL youth policy is concerned.