From yesterday's game :
Keith Senior, 12th minute chicken wing tackle. Warning letter, no charge.
Luke Burgess, high tackle on Roby, 1-4 match ban.
Lee Gilmour, 33rd minute high tackle. Penalty sufficient, no charge.

Surprised the Ablett trip on Meli wasn't spotted.

What about Meli taking out Sinfield, looked pretty bad

Not on the RFL website.

I,m sure Senior has been copped a few times now but he keeps getting warning letters. Are they waiting until he seriously damages someone.

The trip on Meli is a 5 matcher if I ever seen one.

Seniors tackle on Gidley could have been taken there aswell. Quite dangerous

Senior's late knee's into Ade's face is a 5 matcher if I ever seen one.

This chicken wing thing is ridiculous.

Why did Maurie get banned for one game straight up with no warning letter?

I think the one match ban is correct (or even more) but it needs to be implemented for every player who is caught chicken winging.

It's too inconsistant, Maurie got a match ban but Diskin didn't for his chicken wing on Wheeler the other week.

This is the RFL your on about, the RFL disciplinary, the panel of plebs who say "1 match ban sir" and then the next week say "nothign to answer for sir" for the very same incident... never say the RFL judges are ridiculous, they are jsut misunderstood and a little jellified in the brain.

I noticed and remarked at the time about the knee in Ade's face. Diskin and Sinfield are one of the main culprits of going into the tackle with their knees though.

dirty leeds get away with it again

At least Burgess is still facing a ban.

I'm afraid I have to agree, shouldn't be warning letters, if it's a chicken wing tackle it's a one match ban. End of.

Pryce got a way with a blatant pull back on Gibson however.

I am sure I read the other week that the panel consists of 6 persons. Three sit one week and three the next. If that is the case then that is were the inconsistances lie. I suppose it depends whose on the panel for the particular week if you are up on a charge.

Yes he did.

It wasnt blatant, I only noticed it on the TV replay

I thought that when I saw it. Not even put on report by the ref. I'd love to know how many matches are missed by players banned for fouls that don't get sent off for, surely sending off is a much better deterrent and much fairer to the team fouled against than a ban when they can just rotate another player in to replace him.

It was a high shot for which he was penalised. I have seen worse not even referred to the disciplinary. It was never a sending off.

Peacock was also involved in the tackle leaving Burgess little to get hold of. Clumsy rather than malicious.

If Burgess cops a ban then the disciplinary panel then I'd be very suprised, unless they decide to make an example of one of Leeds young players.

Can't belive this has gone unmentioned. Ade even turned round & looked at the freak..
Surely he's due for retiring soon

...And Leeds should have been down to 12 when there was a professional fool (holding down after a break) on Meli.

..And as the Leed fan in front of me quite rightly pointed out, Saints failed to play the ball with the foot on a number of occasions.



...But on the other hand Leeds were guilty of feeding at the scrum too

This has to be taken out of the game but until players get punished it will stay in the game theres no place for it.

Nah, Ade is still young and got plenty RL in him. As for Senior, must say he is still turning in the performances even at almost 50 and 5 wives down the line.