Only the deluded ones.

HTH

I'm an Hull Fc fan, no hurt for me chuckle brother. On top of that I've got better eyesight than you & Bentham & can clearly see there's no 50/50 about it, he's offside.

Translation: I`ll thscweem n thscweem until im thick until I get my way.......







Dream on muppet and read the Sunday papers.... they all say Well Done Rhinos 18-10 CHAMPIONS

Come back when your team even qualifies for the play offs 2025 maybe.

No, no, no, no hes not. His feet are behind the ball, it is plain to see when you watch the replays. You really need to get a grip and move on. Saints and neutrals alike. It is becoming pathetic now.

I've seen the replays. Doesn't change my view of what I saw at the match. He was offisde.

Thick or ignorant coming from someone who has done the same post three times without realising he can edit it!!!

Have you caught that damn mouse yet that everyone refers to but you haven't seen. Tricky things these PC thingies to yarkshire filk where electricity has just been discovered.

Oh yes cummings says he agrees with ref what a shock.
He also said he heard a rumour that bears defecate in wooded areas and that the pope may be of the christian faith.

You clown, if he disagreed with BENTham's decision he would have to demote him etc.





If you care to read league express, all the other "experts" etc like sadler say it was no try.

Even Stevo, that great lover of Leeds, is still saying it was offside.

In fact he says that the over pitch camera which was not available to BENTham was even more conclusive to the fact Smith was offside.

The reason we have not let this issue "go" IMO is not the fact we lost but because the whinos can't see that there was any doubt about it. Even Lee Smith says he wasn't absolutely certain either way.

I accept that if it had been the other way round, I would be extremely pleased but I would have also thought that we had been a bit lucky (as we were against bradford with the knock on / no knock on by withers). Unfortuntately to most leeds fans think that magnanimousness is some sort of alcoholic drink.

Oh a hull fc fan that makes you a total neutral

your as bigger Leeds haters as they come! The only fans that wanted Leeds to win were some Wigan fans and wire fans! The rest were all for saints snd gaggin for Leeds to lose and you know it!

you are beating yourself with a stick mate! I haven't spoke to a Leeds fan who didn't think it was a 50/50! It was such a tight call it could have gone either way! it has been said If the call had gone the other way there would have been the same arguments! Because it was a close call! that's the truth. the 50/50 went Leeds way! I'm sick of posting this but I'm just gonna keep going

Damn shame. I was hoping you'd bog off back to your own board.

You see that's the real thing isn't it! We all have selective hearing, we all think dewsbury stevo hates Leeds!

your not gonna start stalking me again are you?

yeah I saw it I just couldn't be bothered as my iPhone froze

So I see:


Did you get it wet?

Really? You obviously know me really well then...not! As it happens I prefer Leeds to Saints, who I wanted to win wasn't really a consideration I just wanted a cracking match. Still offside despite the cover up from Cummins. Next season ALL the offisdes will NOW have to be decided in the same way otherwise chairmen & coaches will be up in arms.
Previously as I said it was where the feet were in relation to the other player/s that counted NOT the ball.FACT!
The RFL now need to make this distinction clear.

Jesus, the only reason Cummins has come out in support of Bentham is because of the three idiots at sky bleating on about it. Maybe if they knew the rules there wouldn't have been such an outcry.

Oh and while we're on, if bentham is such a Leeds lover how come he gave Eastmonds try when he knocked on first?

has a warrior its great u loss like that,cause all the cheating in the past an u got away with it ,now u no wat its like













same old saint always cheating haaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaaa about time,try the swings not the roundabouts,god is good.

Anyone? I need this translating from Goon!!

All this idiot has posted is drivel/poor trolling attempts - I'm suprised he's not been banned. Trolling always works better when it's done in a language people can understand.

Head of referees agrees with one of his own, shocker!!!!

Yes, but that rule is not about attacking kicks in play is it, that is about off-side for the defending side gathering an attacking kick!

You are right that there is no definitive rule that covers an attacking player being on-side for a kick in open play however, most other references in the rule book in relation to kicks and players being on-side do state that players have to be behind the ball NOT behind the player!

The most notable of these is Section 13, Rule 3 which covers penalty kicks and clearly states that the players are on side if they are behind the ball. It would be very inconsistent of the rules to therefore have any different rule for a kick in open play and any other type of kick!

As a student of the rules, I have always understood that off-side/on-side for ALL kicks in based on the player being behind the ball and for all other off-side/on-side requirements that a player have (well now anyway) both feet behind or level with the reference be it player/line/ref/linesman mark.

I'm not sure its possible to ban someone when you cannot make out a word they're mumbling.

If you ignore it it might go away, like his dad thought about the bout of crabs he caught from his sister when it was being conceived.