In this game Singleton reminded me of a young James Graham, I hope he continues like that.

But previously it was......





Ooooops!

Perhaps you need to go a little deeper than 'oooops' if wishing to highlight an 'apparent' contradiction.

The 2013 figures are largely accepted because whilst accurately described as incomplete in terms of all 1st grade games the averages that resulted at least were indicative of the data-set from which they were drawn.

_____

To your amended stat post: Assuming these are the previously witnessed and largely accepted figures from a known data-set, we're half way there just as we were when they first appeared on page 4 some 54 days ago.

54 days for a cut and paste, let's just hope the amended and comparable other half turn up before anyone loses interest.

The 2013 figures are largely accepted because they were right all along.....your previous claim of them being incomplete was just pure and simply YOU BEING WRONG. People can knock me for getting something wrong too, but at least I'm decent enough to admit my mistakes. Shame some others on here aren't.




I think that happened about 40+ days ago. If only you'd have asked sensibly for a re-edit straight away instead of going for your John Wayne Loser Leaves Town plan.

Do the 2013 figures from Opta include all Leeds' 1st grade games from that season ?

If the answer is NO (and it always has been) how can someone accurately stating that fact be wrong ?

One of us created a flawed comparison because they simply didn't understand the data-set used by Opta in 2012 as opposed to the one used in 2013 - for the removal of any doubt, that would be you - while the other merely pointed out that it would be foolish to attach any relevance to the outcomes of the flawed comparison.



No doubt but as long as you continue to hark back to this debate elsewhere within this forum there may be some who may care for a refresher (the last couple of pages should suffice) and wonder as I do if you'll ever post the corrected 2012 figures and see if they support your initial statements from around the page 4 area.



If only you had put some accurate comparisons up for discussion in the first place. If only you had put some quality effort in before telling people -off the back of stats you mangled - that they should



Perhaps it's about time you finally posted the accurate figures (those from 2012 comparable to the data-set used for 2013 - or reduce 2013 to make them comparable to the data-set of 2012) to see how much weight they actually hold - I imagine people will have long since drawn their own conclusions as to why the previously promised corrected stats have never appeared.

Well I for one certainly have.................