Thought the turning point was the injury to Rhys . I know we scored just after but up to then he was immense .Hope it's not a serious injury. However, one player I am most disappointed in is Travis. When is he going to start playing?

main question for you guys, why cant you tackle like that on other matches

Proof, if it was ever in doubt, that rovers treat a game against Hull as their cup final and raise their game accordingly.

Don't know why anybody, who genuinely has watched the NRL for the last few years, thought Burns would be a good signing.

And the same could be said of Hull last week against Wire.

Its a game against a different type of opposition. If you dont expect your rivals to lift a notch against you then you are living in Gansons world....
Widnes did the same to us over Easter...... the game after we beat top of the league huddersfield....

It happens all the time.... However stealing a match like you did, thankfully doesn't happen much.
I wouldnt get all Billy Big Balls about it..

The teams that have posted points on us have been better than you, simple.

morning dum dum,

Put that mirror away.

Didn't a certain poster call Burns and Dobson the best half back pairing in Super League

The turning point was Greg "Billy Slater"Eden failing to catch the ball !!

We are better than salford,cas and bradford surely.

No where near.

Even the class of Wakefield out shines us.

No it wasn't daft lad.

As did Hull, or didn't you see the 'all pile on' celebration of the illegal try. Game meant just as much to Hull.

Yeah fancy signing a first grade half back when we could have waited 6 months and signed a THIRD choice. What were we thinking?

Past it first grade half back come for payday or young raw australian talent to prove a point.. Hmm think 6 months is worth the wait

Past it at 29 dont think so.

The awarding of the Yeaman no-try was the turning point, it gave hope where none should have been given.

What like Dobson?

Who would you rather have Burns or Dobson?

It was a try. The ball was on the line and in his hand. Everyone on the TV seemed happy with it. To say it was a no try just shows bitterness and a need to look for excuses.

Stick to the real "no try".

Nothing wrong with Yeaman's try whatsoever.

In your unbiased opinion. 50/50.

I'd say it was more 90/10. There was very little doubt after seeing a picture on a screen with the ball on the line and Yeaman's hand on it. Although we can't rely on the video these days...

I think it was still unclear it was touching the line and in real time it looks like he's lost control of the ball before it hits the ground.

But, the person who gave the try can't see someone stood 2 yards offside and follow them down the pitch so what hope is there that any of his decisions were correct.

90/10.