Having had to miss last nights game & waste a days holliday(I have booked today off) because of Sky moving the match I have just watched the game on recording. The idiot Stevenson must have had some real bad experiance at the hands of Rovers, for all the constructive coments from the other comentators all he could do was snipe critisise & denegrate anthing in red & white, I susspect his disslike stems from his assertion that we as a club should have merged with FC to form the humberside club? It allso worries me that he continually denegrates the challenge cup I am sure he wants super league clubs out of that competition. Mabey it is my paranioa but he appears to be the mouth piece for the Sky set up other wise why let the fool anywhere near a micraphone.

He also said Rovers didn't control the game.

Good job Phil Clarke was there putting the game into perspective. Stevo and Hemmings were complete idiots last night.

Welcome to SL proper. You must have learnt by now that according to SKY, lazy Journos and the SL apologists on the VT there are only six teams and SL that really count. The big 4 Leeds, Bradford, Wigan and Saints. They should win every game and every comp and whe they don't it's a fluke, and abomination, a blip. The die was cast in 1994 and that is how it was and that's how they want it to be - hell it's far to difficult to take and interest in the other teams - there all imposters any way.

The other two teams are London who must be a success must they not.
Cas are the plucky outsiders with great support and loads of youngsters, they don't actually expect them to win but it's nice to have someone to patronise and Cas fans seem to like it.

Eddie in particular can barely spit the word Wakefield so offended is he by our relative success. Sad ain't it.

No you're not paranoid at all.

Agree his comments during the game were very harsh, I mean dont get me wrong the game was scrappy and at times Rovers looked more fatigued than Huddersfield although sometimes a week off you get a bit rusty and this game just oiled us up for the finals run in.

When Eddie said that the SL wasn't designed for two teams from the same city it set the tone for the reception we would recieve from the Sky commentary team.

I think the sooner Rovers get the stadium upto scratch and both Hull clubs are challenging for honours (not a 9's competition either!) Eddie and Stevo will both have to eat their words.

Nah Nick Fook it lets win the bugger this year then the words will be eaten anyway I would like for them to eat those words Bruce Lee style but we are not that lucky.

i thought the twenty minute conversation they had on cookie's "wishbone" (what the hell lol????) tackle, and that all our tries were against the run of play. The icing on the cake was that he said Warrington should be winning if they hadn't had the tries dissalowwed. Techincally true, but THEY HAD THE TRIES DISSALOWWED lol

Oh yeah

Giving us credit for winning at knowsley road "but it was only by a point"

He's a numpty as well

FWIW I felt the 'double movement' try for Wire in the first half should have stood. The player's arm was free and our defenders should have stopped the grounding. That was a get out of jail card.

He was held, his momentum was stopped. It was the correct decision

Anyway, that was thread drift on my part. Stevo is a tool and seemingly proud of the fact.

He's not as bad as he wigged friend though

got it in one, he never praises either Hull club. We barely got a mention from SKY in 2006 until about a week before the grand final when Stevo thought he'd hedge his bets and suggest Hull had a chance of winning it.

Stevo is a complete pillock, why they persist with him I don't know.

His description of Cooke's try:

"Right on the hairstyle, move the quiff to one side, and put the ball down"

What the f*ck is this bloke on?

The sky commentators arent worth getting wound up about, just think how sweet it will be when we win the GF and they HAVE to eat their words

.... Mind you we will have had the rub of the green, the benefit of some dodgy refereeing decisions and our tries probably will come against the run of play and our opposition were missing a few players

I am glad its not just me. I have a love of this old game & have been around it as long as the idiot Stevo (He was no angel on the field or off it) I am sure ther are a clique of people who are pulling the strings egged on by Sky who have thier own agenda for the game & I dont think they are interested in the Challenge cup or anything that is not super league & seeling satalite dishes. Don't get me wrong I am a unrepentant expansionist & wellcome the inclusion of the French sides along with Celtic & London I just feel that the game (the super league bit) can keep growing as long as we keep a check on our costs. I see no need to relagate any side just add to the franchise as the American sports do. But when I hear the idiot saying we dont want this in our game when we have a scuffle on the pitch I wonder where he is comming from? of course we want it in our game we all like a bit of spice in the game its the only excitement most of us get in our lifes. I is often the odd remark in his comentry or interviews on sport news you get a glimps of the real stevo & I feel his views are in favour with the paymasters of the game, he must have a foothold in the Murdock empire as he isn't employed for his commentry or journalistic skills, Even Ray french is better & more ballanced.

Just last night ?

If you read the RL express, Stevo's column is a joke as well. I can't think of the last time I heard him mention a Hull team unless it's something negative happening. It's usually 5 or 6 Leeds / Saints articles and big chunk of Wigan and not a lot else.

The man is a fool. The comment about wire having 3 tries dissallowed, us getting 2 breakaway tries and ifs and buts was just ridiculous. He might as well have just said if wire had scored more points then us they'd have won.

You are Eric Morecombe,and I claim my £5