No it didn't.
The words I used were 'Hold up' which doesn't mean the project is in doubt now if I had said 'Risk to the project' then you would be correct fortunatly those were not the words I used.

Perhaps you could tell the builders this as some of them seemed totally perplexed and a little quizical about the whole issue.

So after lots of false dawns we actually start something and just fail to mention it yeah I can totally see the logic there!!.

You had a go at me by claiming my post placed doubt over the build and yet you are now advocating us not mentioning it.
Exactly why that is the case is puzzling when even the most pesimistic of us fail to think it is now not going to be built unless of course you are having doubts yourself.

No doubts from me, none at all.

The builders I deal with in my office at work seem that way about most things tbh.

dont slag the builders off there the real experts not you sat in office sorting your paperwork out pretending your important {im a builder / joiner by the way }

I'd say the Engineers and Architects are the real experts, but a lot of them haven't got a clue either.

I'm actually sat in the office doing CAD and pretending i'm important btw

As you can see the gas, water and electrical cables are in and the trench is now filled.



Access manhole being created next to the West stand.



Its starting to look like they are preparing for bigger things soon.





Although you can't quiet tell there is a decent hole surrounded by fencing here.



Another temp structure being built here.

seemed a bit more going on today there was a small digger big digger and a really big digger be nice when we see some steel work

It'll be awhile before the project gets to that stage.

you are dead right edith it is all hearsay and i am has old has the houses

You could well be right. Still subject to completion of a funding agreement according to the council.

If that is true then the builders I talked too were bang on the money Unfortunatly.
But I have to ask where the official story about this comes from.

Should call it the peter may stand if you really want to acknowledge who saved the club in it's darkest hour

This time next week you'll probably feel totally different.

Larry you post a lot of stuff that is way OTT but in this instance I have to agree.

No matter how you dress it up, the bottom line is that Colin Hutton was the Chairman of the club (and therefore ultimately responsible) at the time when some catastrophic decisions where made which in my opinion resulted in 20 years of decay playing in a stadium which set us back in a really way.

It's quite possible that Colin Hutton is sorry for the club and regrets some of the decisions he made at that time but the reality is, is that we're still paying the price for those decisions.

I'm fine about it.
Stuff is happening and I can't belive building would have started if there were any chance of it not coming off.

Does the stand have to be completed for the next derby game to be at CP?

What is the timescale for the decision to be made, you would imagine it would have to be soon, if they want to switch to the KC?

The stand is a 52 week build no chance for the derby.

Cheers Easty.

Think I have mis-understood a few things.

If the derby is at CP, where will the Hull fans go?

Dave

South?

River.

Zebrugge???

No fan, no matter what team they support should have to pay more than a tenner to watch from the south stand IMO.

I agree, but it's Hull FC so it doesn't matter.

Bit out touch with your ground developments, so,

Why was the first game switched?

I am back for the derby and it will be first live derby in three years, but really not keen on the south stand after my last visit there.

What is the capcity at CP currently?