Well lets see what the disciplinary lot say. If he cops a ban then we're right. If not, then you are. Can't say fairer than that.

Quote ="davey37" Quote ="Wildmoose"Didn't look that bad to me, thought he struck Crooks around the collar bone, penalty & talking to seemed sufficient. Tbf I have only seen one angle though, not sure if replays make it look worse. Not understanding the disclipinary here. Burns has been summoned for a grade B but Ryan Bailey has the option of an early plea for a grade C? www.superleague.co.uk/article/27 ... rs-charged'" I suggest you watch it again. Initial impact is with the temple (and Crooks is a TALL lad) and ends up around his neck.'" As I stated I've only seen one angle (the high camera on halfway). This is the only angle on Rovers tv, SL highlights don't show the tackle & SL show isn't on iplayer yet. Pretty inconclusive based on that, need more of a front on view. Travis' arm is swinging horizontal / upwards & Crooks is falling so how does the contact start at the temple & end round the neck?

Quote ="davey37" Quote ="Wildmoose"Didn't look that bad to me, thought he struck Crooks around the collar bone, penalty & talking to seemed sufficient. Tbf I have only seen one angle though, not sure if replays make it look worse. Not understanding the disclipinary here. Burns has been summoned for a grade B but Ryan Bailey has the option of an early plea for a grade C? www.superleague.co.uk/article/27 ... rs-charged'" I suggest you watch it again. Initial impact is with the temple (and Crooks is a TALL lad) and ends up around his neck.'" As I stated I've only seen one angle (the high camera on halfway). This is the only angle on Rovers tv, SL highlights don't show the tackle & SL show isn't on iplayer yet. Pretty inconclusive based on that, need more of a front on view. Travis' arm is swinging horizontal / upwards & Crooks is falling so how does the contact start at the temple & end round the neck?

Nowt like sitting on the fence

You know me Ginge. As fair as they come!!

That is very true

2 match ban, will miss St Helens and Huddersfield games.

Wasn't the worst tackle but looked pretty malicious the way he swung his arm around and hit crooks in the head. Certainly was never an attempt at a legitimate tackle and he knew what he was doing. He has previous for it so no surprise it's coming out here already. Still, I'm guessing he's probably wishing ganson did send him off

I have not seen one FC fan claim it to be the worst tackle EVER despite what some of you claim.

However, it was bad and should have been punished properly by Ganson.

Fair enough.

Best/worst camera is sky's in SE corner.

Shows how bad it is. And Crooks was NOT falling.

Haven't watched it since, at the time on SKY I thought he was lucky not to get sent off and was a minimum yellow.

I felt he got neither at the time because Ganson was too fat to keep up and get a decent view of the incident.

Two games is what's deserved. I'm not sure you can do that maliciously at that speed, if he can he'll spend most of his time in the stands, it was certainly a bad one but not the worst I've seen. Worst one in recent memory for me was Mathers on King a few years ago.

kr fans saying nothing wrong with it how come hes got a 2 match ban???

Oh my.

What all of them?

A good few yeah bud.

Bent redhall rfl are a joke

Tee Hee - I love a girl with a sense of humour!!

I still think it (the tackle) should have been dealt with on the pitch by Ganson and IMO Burns should have walked. Two matches is what he deserves, it was, if not malicious an outrageous reckless tackle to the head. Dirty so and so and not let's forget Mr Burns does have form in the headhunter tackle dept.
I saw him in Aubrey's today buying some more clothes lines

I thought he might well get a yellow at the time, and ultimately Horne did for next to nowt, and thought he'd likely get a game. Tiny bit surprised it is 2, more based on the leniency I've seen, or at least perceived, in the past. Chase only got 3 for his on Ropati. No real complaints though, tbh, as long as it is consistently applied.

One thing Red Hall don't do is consistency. It's the same with the refs, each one would adjudicate a match completely differently to the next.

Take a look at your avatar if you want to see what a malicious headhunter looks like !!!!

Well it's right he just went to tickle him around the neck what's up with that

burns as a pretty poor record anyhow he started on a ban.

I tend not to live in the past to be fair. Grow up!

That was so last season so what ur saying is he's on red Halls radar like I said they're all bent

Then why are you going on about a challenge that happened LAST Friday lmao........ surely that is in the PAST...