Withers is crap.

No he isn't tell me y he is crap

Just is.

Carlile is better.

The jury is still out on Withers, for me!

Josh Hodgson is our No1 '9' imo

We sign a hooker from a team who were regular whipping boys and our fans build him up to be something amazing, the two young lads are far better already and will only improve.

Sorry but IMO J hodgson's best roles for Hull KR are away from hooker, for me he is better suited to 13.

Withers would be my hooker of choice

Well done for proving that you know sweet =#FF0000Edit-AS all about RL.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion on players, I don't agree with Dum-Dum on this but there will be another player that he rates that you don't.


I like Withers and his ability to slot in at 7 is a bonus

Josh looks like he is going to prove Mr Gekko (remember him) right though. He's been up there with Mika as our best player.

Not seen enough of Carlisle

Withers was always to good for crusaders am sure keal will get his chance soon I think it's just cos I ant really seen him play am sure ur right bout him

Give over, what makes Withers so good?

We'd not have signed him hadn't the RFL laxed the rules for Crusaders players.

You would think the Crusaders were a team of superstars the way people are carrying on, they weren't and Withers is no exception.

Just me that thinks all 3 hookers weve got are average at best then?

Withers was great in Aus but is average over here and isn't getting younger, our two lads are just that, lads, and we've all seen Josh progress, it's anyone's guess how good he'll get. Carlile on the other hand was outstanding before his troubles and given a bit of time and trust he'll be a game breaker.

another one who knows nothing

withers was the reason dobson didnt make it in austrailia and did you watch the saints game withers ran the show until he was injured

He was allowed the time and space by our big forwards, as proven by the fact that we weren't outplayed when he went off.

Anyone with an ounce of knowledge about rugby league should know Withers is not a bad or average player! Was it me or did anyone not see him against St Helens? Half of you must be blind! He was by far our best player, defense and attack. And after he came off injured we did lose our way. Some of you lot wanna smell what your shovelling!

Stevo could have played behind that pack and looked good, a decent hooker would have put the game beyond Saints.

Really? I'd like to have seen that! You keep stevo, and I'll keep Withers. What a plonker!

It's great that your RL 'knowledge' entitles you to form an opinion on a player whos performed well for less than 40 minutes, an opinion that contracdicts my own and others that he is merely an average hooker. Like most of our rose tinted fans.

Withers was a good signing because of the cover he offers and the fact he's got experience (hopefully we use his experience in the NRL rather than at Crusaders) But that doesn't deter from the fact that there is a high possibility he isn't our best Hooker.

Have played the game to a high standard and offciated too.Have you?? Ive listened to what you have to say, and my answer is still the same. Your a plonker!

You know when you're wrong when you have to resort to name calling.

Enjoy the game today, no fighting.

Oh, and to answer your question, yes I have, what does [ithat[/i matter?

i dont know what your downer on withers is but you talk about our pack yes it looks awesome when we have micky p and clinton on but when we have to spell them its a different story so maybe you should take them rose tinted specs off

STARTING 13 v Widnes: McDonnell, Hall, Welham, Webster, Latus, Lovegrove, Dobson, Clinton, Withers, Taylor, Josh Hodgson, Horne, Watts.

Bench: Murrell, Paea, Netherton, Cox

Now now girls.

Frankie - its a forum its all about opinions my little keyboard warrior friend. Wether you are or not means naff all to anyone.

For me Wither is by far our best hooker but i still only think he is average now hes getting on. Hopefully his experience will make the other to better.