Apology accepted.

I didn't give one. I was sorry for engaging in an exchange with a half-wit who can't work out what he has posted earlier!

:1hj3vojl

quote="Gavin Miller - Legend"=red:1hj3vojlLets debate without the insults.
Otherwise posts and posters will end up getting removed.

Thanks.

That warning includes Rovers fans too Vince.
Cut it out.

*sigh*

Now you're just embarrassing yourself. I'm pretty sure everyone else understands - it's really not that difficult - but you're so interested in trying to score points that you just can't see what's in front of you.

OK - I'll take pity on you and spell it out...

The OP stated that the rent on the KC was going up, and that FC would have to fund around 30% of the increase. The SMC do not rent the KC - they bought the Master Lease. There is no rent on the KC for FC to fund 30% of.

FC pay rent to the SMC and not the Council, specifically for the use of the KC. This rent is negotiated between the SMC and FC, not any outside body.

So you don't believe your club can raise their share of the money to upgrade the tip into your training ground either then.

Let me get this right then. There is no rent but you pay rent to the SMC as you have always done and it may go up. I think we all get it now !!
Pedantic or what?
What difference does it make what the master lease says, you pay rent at the KC...end of!!

Careful Vincenzo..... he thinks he's a mod.............




















On the Rovers board

You still haven't understood what the OP was getting at, have you?

Bless.

Forunately for me Mr.twenty-odd thousand posts, I have more in my life to bother about!

And the eventual last-ditch excuse arrives at last. Classic.



Night night.

Mmmh not worried the last time I heard the value of the loan was around 1.7 million loan ?

Now Hull Super League have had to sign expensive old talent it's going to be an interesting year balancing the books.

Here's a question for anybody to answer.

Is the currently financial situation and debt at Rovers any different to the debt that Hull FC accrued which almost forced them into oblivion and caused the merger with Gateshead?

Now if Neil Hudgall is saying that the club cannot keep sustaining the losses, and he's only lookign to the end of 2010, what happens then if rovers lose a similar amount, when does a chairman/main investor say enough is enough, I don't have the money to pump in anymore. Will new backers, if they are found want to bail a club out of almost £3m debt, especially in this current economic climate.

People mention about the Directors loans at Hull FC, but the club is making a profit even whilst paying those loans off. Are The Hull KR backers able to still do the same thing , even though they are posting huge losses?

Keep it up and you'll soon reach the magic 24000 posts! Wow

With the most popular shirt in years, that will balance the books. 15000 sales expected. no other club in super league sells 10000.
Its a shame the same can't be said about your shirt. with your debt already close to 3m. apparantly. will your lot lose more?

is that a fact, or a story? i reckon leeds may surpass that figure given their attendance and recent success.

I'd be surprised if a couple of clubs dont sell more than 10000

wigan, wire, saints?

Was thinking Wigan and Leeds for starters. Dont have any stats for it though.

Thats more to take back after the fading starts after one wash....on second thoughts not many hull fans will reach that total of washes though.

So, given that your claim that only Hull can shift more than 10,000 shirts is now ripped to pieces, can we take it that the rest of your output is of a similar level of fantasy?

its amazing how many Hull fans come on here and talk of Rovers debts as if we are the only club who runs at a loss, id guess 12 out of the 14 S/L clubs will post loses again this year, do you post on there pages too i wonder???

Like the way the new board looks, can't make any of it work. Bloody kids and their new technology.

The other clubs aren't based in Hull so we wont post on their board.