www.nrl.com/graham-suspended-for ... fault.aspx

www.nrl.com/graham-suspended-for ... fault.aspx

he`d have no problems chomping through one of your mighty mixed grills lol

he pleaded NOT GUILTY who was advising him, Hudge???

Shouldn't this be on the NRL thread?
Biting! he should have being banned for a season the dirty b astard.

Now that Graham has received a lengthy suspension will the Bulldogs lose some of their bite in the 2013 season?

Sorry, but someone had to say this!

I don't disagree with the length of Grahams ban as there is no place for biting in the sport simple, however when I consider the the fact Chase broke a players jaw with his high cheap shot this season and got less I find it confusing to say the least.

Have to say I'm dubious as to how they have come up with this looking at the tiny scratch on Slaters ear, surely if he had been bitten on his ear his ear would have more evidence of a bite on the helix of his ear not just a very tiny scratch on the antihelix???

Gotta agree, the picture of his ear does not show a bite in my opinion , My brother had the top of his ear bitten in a brawl with another marine and looked gastly afterwards, that to me wasnt a bite...
AND never ever saw Jammer as a dirty player , rough tough and fight anyone but not dirty

So a Dr's testimony that it didnt resemble a bite, the fact you dont actually see him bite him - and he gets banned for 12 weeks for biting. Doesnt seem right to me

agree, why would we ever imagine a Pom would get a fair hearing in Oz eh??

Slater's the golden boy, and the video shows graham having a good dig and I only saw it live but it looked like he was [itrying[/i to bite him.

If you want to bite something, you clamp your teeth/close your mouth - he doesnt at any point do that

Maybe not a full bite but looks like he's given Slater's ear a serious massage with the top part of his gum shield to me.

you are either Graham's mother or defence lawyer

Graham bit Slater, wether he bit him hard, soft or nibbled him is irrelevant, he bit him and he got what he deserved.

Looked like a bite to me when I saw it live. Haven't seen anything since to change my mind, regardless of how much damage was done to Slater's ear. Ban length seems about right IMO.

Agreed - should never have put himself in that position. Ban deserved.

could we sign him for 12 weeks while his ban is up it will keep him match fit help us out a bit (doing a travis burns, banned then come to england)

No, just like Travis Burns his ban would come over with him & if he was on loan out of the NRL he wouldn't technically be missing any games so shouldn't have any taken off his ban imo.