at London v Salford.

What an absolute f--king joke.

London get out of SL......NOW....it's beyond EMBARASSING.

Thought it was 1,157?

As bad as it is, there won't have been any salford fans there and it's probably only 2-3000 less london fans than there have been salford fans at some of their home games this year. Whilst SLE are buying bradford, what are they doing to help london promote teh game in the capital?

Maybe the Olympic games stopped a lot of potential fans attending because of traffic congestion, raised prices or the fact they wanted to attend the Olympic games in the first instance.
Maybe it's about time RL became an Olympic sport, at least we would get a bronze medal.

It's been a largely failed enterprise down there, poorly marketed too. Then again, same for the various welsh incarnations.

The Sky money is being wasted, in my opinion.

So on the basis of attendances only you want a club to relinquish their tenure in a league???
Obviously you have never looked back at the history of the game when all sorts of clubs have had poor attendances. Even the mighty Wigan not too many years ago (81 season I think) were struggling to 4-5000 through the gate in THE biggest area for RL, would you have been asking them to drop out of the league on that basis. What about FC in the 70s when our attendances were shocking and we had less than 2000 for a home game, should we have dropped out of the league we played in??
Your reasoning (or lack thereof) is an absolute fecking joke

There was at least one Salford fan there and he wanted to fight Sean Long!!

Failed in what sense, to ignite supporters to watch the pro team, I'll give you that, but in every other sense having a London pro team has being successful. Do you know the numbers of participants in RL as a whole in the South/South East region compared to 20-15-10. even 5 years ago???

I've watched the development of RL here in the South/London for quite a few years and now even my (adopted) home town has a RL team in one of the strongest union areas. They are in the lowest leagues possible BUT they get a spread in the local rag. This isn't just ex-pats these are lads who are wanting to play RL from a young age and want something to aim for. Having a pro team in London and the spreading of the game at the higher amateur levels has been a (part) catalyst for that.
So if you feel that RL is a failure in the capital/South, then you're wrong on pretty much every count.

I see your point, but as a team in the highest league in this hemisphere, that attendance was nothing short of an embarrassment.

Since the days of Fulham and even Kent Invicta, I've been going to the capital for FC games. In all the years, we have outnumbered the home fans easily. There was a brief flurry of action down there when Branson took over the Bronco's and led them out at a CC final, but that's it really. I'd sooner give the London Sky money to a NL1 team and see them use it for grass roots.

Really is embarrassing.

It will be more embarrassing if they fold and our next tv deal drops even though viewing figures have risen 45%.

houghtons heroes,i think you will find it was sheffield eagles that branson took over when they where in the cc cup final.i could be wrong,and don`t mind being corrected.

Definitely London Bronco's.

Sorry EY it was London - I suspect Branson does not even know where Sheffield is.

EMBARRASING ATTENDANCE, I REALLY FEEL FOR THE TRUE BRONCO'S FANS AND THE PLAYERS WHO ARE DOWN THERE.....TO SAY THERE UP AGAINST IT IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT...... LETS BE HONEST, THEY COULD SIGN THE ENTIRE AUSTRALIA TEAM AND ATTENDANCES WOULDNT GO INTO 5 FIGURES, SEEMS LIKE THE RFL ARE FLOGGING A DEAD HORSE IM AFRAID.... MAYBE ITS TIME THE BRONCOS WERE PULLED FROM LONDON AND RELOCATED SOMEWHERE MORE RUGBY LEAGUE ORIENTATED SUCH AS CUMBRIA....

I agree. Let's scrap RL in London, give up on the huge growth in grassroots and participation levels and say goodbye to a chunk of Sky TV money. We can then bring in a team from Cumbria, based in some backwater town with a tiny population, in an area where RL is fully saturated at grassroots & amateur level.

Yeah, great idea that mate.

and you think that London is a better idea than that do you


clearly the attendances prove you incorrect, if they were interested in watching they would bloody well be there wouldnt they...
so if London fold all the grass roots teams in the area will too??? some of them grass roots teams were there before the london team were first put together mate, the broncos are a joke and have no bearing on the grass roots stuff in and around the capital, they only have 4 community officers FFS how much do you think they do LOL,
stick to jam mate

Quick, your flat cap has blown off and your whippets are chasing after it

Go on then, how many? Let's not count Acton & Willsden and Streatham who actually joined the league in 1935 and folded yonks ago, also Ealing, Peckham, Hillingdon & London Colonials no longer exist. So crack on, how many grass roots sides were around at the time of the Formation of the Fulham side then?
I bet you haven't got a clue how many schools/kids now have RL coaching in the Greater London area do you, as for the how many community officers

They have a 7 man team down at Broncos, anything else you'd care to get wrong?

thanks guys ,i stand corrected.

Wow. What an ignorant post. Complete with made up facts too, well done.