5 competative defeats in a row, soon to be 6. Just thought I'd mention it.

Correct, we're 3 from 10. Of the 3, one was the controversial last minute penalty v Crusaders, 1 was a 4 pointer v Rovers, the other v Harlequins.

when you read stuff like that,it does make you wonder why the board hasnt acted already which to me is a bit concerning tbh.....

Agar's coaching record:

Played 75, won 32 (43%), lost 43.

No you are all wrong. Its only 2 games.



At least that is what the "faithful" would have us believe and then intelligent people who don't have any emotional ties to the club.

I noted that McDermotts win record before last night was 39% and that was at Quins. Ok he has now moved to a big club, for reasons only known to the good people at Leeds. But isn't Agars record something similar at Hull?

That makes us on a par with Quins. No disrespect to Quins, but the gulf in wealth and experience between the two clubs means we should be far better. Theory and reality in all walks of life so different.

out of interest does anyone know how this compares to sharps and kears record?

Kear
P42 W24 D2 L16 57%

Sharpe
P68 W38 D3 L27 58%

Wow.

John Kear: 2005 15-2-11
2006 3-0-4

Win ratio 51.4% (53.6% for full season 2005 which of course included a CC win)

Peter Sharpe: 2006 14-0-3
2007 14-2-11
2008 4-1-9

Win Ratio 55.2%

Shaun McRae: 2000 12-1-15
2001 20-2-6
2002 16-0-12
2003 13-3-12
2004 19-2-7

Win ratio 57.1%

So, Statistly Agar is confirmed as our worst coach, by a significant margin, over the last decade...

which unbelievably makes things seem even more bewildering...

So basically his record is already worse than previous coaches!!
Yet to our board this is obviously acceptable..

One can only assume he's working for free

Even free would be way to much for him

Either that or he's actually paying off a debt he owes the board.

So, Kear 57% (and a Challenge Cup), given 15 months
Sharp 58% (and a Grand Final), given 24 months
Agar 42% given 35 months+ with a further 2 unexpired years to go.

Is that right?

If that was so, then maybe just writing off the debt for the good off the club..

how about cleaning the bogs instead of head "coach"?

his record is awfull he just isnt good enough ive been patient with him and defended him in the past but he simply isnt good enough AGAR OUT DANIEL ANDERSON IN

He's more used to churning out than cleaning it up..

Staggering, isn't it?

Completely baffling. I can only assume that after having three coaches leave in relatively short order (Bomber, Kear, Sharp) they decided to try for a bit of stability. Shame they picked completely the wrong bloke to support.

What is Justins Win Percentage ratio??

Not relevant, but actually pretty close to Agar's.

Yup, bewildering isn't it.

I've got a new sig, at least.