In it she says 'We spent to a salary cap maximum...ahead of this season.' Obviously losing Crocker left some cap space, but how did we sign Lauaki and Tansey and pay off Byrne if the cap was full?

Lauaki will have come out of Carvell's wage. Byrne's salary was already accounted for. Tansey will have come out of Crocker's wage.

Well that one's easy. He was already on the cap she's saying was towards maximum, and his payoff will almost certainly have been less than the value of his remaining contract.

And she may well have been including Lauaki in that too, bearing in mind he signed in February so will have most likely been in negotiations before the season started.

I forgot about him





Reading it earlier I couldn't make sense of it. Cheers

Because she knows fookall, utter bollox that, thats why we are in the state we are because we are prepared to have the wool pulled over our eyes

[size=200We have not spent anywhere near the cap [/size

I had thought that James Rule said we were below the cap but I may have misread that.

Prove it.

i don't need to, i know my facts are correct

Exactly.

Who am i going to believe, a person on this forum or the chairperson of my club.

Sorry Brother. I like reading your posts normally but surely even you can see that your constant pulling down of every aspect of the club is becoming tedious? I know things are far from perfect but you're beginning to sound like Bighead.

Was it you who told Blair and Bush about the WMDs?

I know who id believe, and its not Kath.

You prove him wrong from your bedroom with all your mod power

I'm not the one making wild claims.

Guess we'll have to wait until next year's accounts are out.

Baa

The filed accounts won't tell you what we spend on players salaries

The chaire MAN has made a statement. Why shouldn't we take that as read?

Someone refutes it but cannot back it up other than "I know more than you blah blah blah..."

Sorry, unless they are prepared to justify their statement it just looks like spiteful sour grapes.

Is there only me who read the title of this thread and though it sounded a bit smutty

The Chairman who has previously made a statement stating "Paul Cooke is going nowhere" and another stating "We have not broke the salary cap"

On the Thackery fiasco, they removed her power of speech. She has caught Prince Philip syndrome, i think Rule has it too

But it will show you profit and loss. If we're trousering £0.5 million that would normally be spent on player salaries it will show up somewhere.

And just what is a club official supposed to say. "Thats right, those rumours which are going round are right and our star player will be leaving but he hasn't officially gone yet"???

But then again, I doubt SHE actually said either of those statements you claim as you tend to make up a few things to fit in with your hopes.

Plummer, now there is a different kettle of fish akll together!

With regard to Thackrey, firstly it was hardly a fiasco (but its not like you to go OTT now is it

) Secondly, if you can be bothered to either remember or look it up, Rule took responsibility for that

his gaffer should have fired him

I don't care what you beleive , whether it will show in the accounts or not

WE ARE NOWHERE NEAR TO SPENDING THE FULL SALARY CAP