Tickle and Manu still playing for the full 80 mins?

Why oh why do we seem clueless in the oppositions 20?

As much as I rate Horne as a runner of the ball, he seems totally lost when has to create something, albeit his grubber for the Whiting try was clever that was about it.





Think I'm going to start pick and choose the games I attend to this season as I'm not going to carry on pay to watch boring one man rugby, until we start playing with a more exspansive game style!

Simple answe really.... Agar is clueless.

Aye, think we also need a good clear out at the end of the season.

What really p!ssed me off today was how flat we was! So many times if we had hit the ball at pace on the advantage line we could of brushed off rovers players. But instead we stand flat and all rovers had to do was move up 1 - 2 metres and just grab the hull player.

Manu looked goosed 2nd Half...

I've been trying to avoid getting on Agars back, but...



eusa_clap.gif

I couldn't agree more.

Q the call yourself a supporter abuse. I have to say I totally agree. I chose to save the cash today as it was on Sky. Now working Monday so will miss that, but I will be back on Friday as I think we will see a reasonable game between two average sides, though I think they are the better TEAM.

Rovers was goosed 20mins out but we are too feckin clueless.

That doesnt make much sense mate...

But yeah we looked tired last 20.

As for Manu youve got to spell him IMO. Twice now in derbies Rovers have tired him out...

Certainly is. His interchanges are just unbelievable at times, Manu was absolutely out on his feet second half and he should have gone off, and as to taking Thackray off when he was clearly making a difference is beyond me tbh.

Rovers was shagged the last 20mins and kept handing us field position.but we are too sodding clueless to take advantage.

You didn't tire him out mate, Agar does that by keeping him on the field.

Think Agar realises that he is our main attacking weapon, so if he rests him we would look even more clueless if that is possible!?

Good point...we looked better when he was onm.

Attacking weapon, but never when we're near the line,

Tell me about it.

Disagree with those questioning Agar. Agar has to work with what he has. Dont think Thorman has been the No.7 answer. Our big signing hasn't arrived, still waiting for the New Zealander, no Motu or Gaz Raynor... that's four internationals missing from the team. I'm sure if these players were playing things maybe have been different??? However, still does not distract from the fact a specialist no.7 is needed.

Did read one thing from James Webster, that Rovers are vocal in their preparations as Hull are quite. Maybe thats the difference between the two teams and it that that shows?

Well Agar signed him so he is accountable for that.

We are a massive club ran by Amatuers and coached by Amatuers.

Isn't it Agar who give them a gameplan to go out onto the field with?

Plan A....5 drives and a kick.

Plan B......oh fook...does B come after A.

Agar gives the team the game plan (if there is one!!!!) he is responsible for the interchanges.


Both of these areas are very very very very very very very poor at the moment. Thererfore Agar is responsible.

You're not wrong there, the difference in quality between Thorman and Dobson was the difference between the two sides today. One can run, pass, and kick the other unfortunately plays for us.

Agreed

Didnt think he was good tbh.

Suprised how often he took the line on tbh. But apart from a few good kicks he wasn't that good.

He was far better than what we had to offer.

Do be careful with what you post (even if what you write is correct), cos you may get accused of joining the 'witchhunt'!!