Since when has game 1 been mid-season? And you give our board far too much credit if you think like this.

Jamie Lyon, just seen him boarding a flight from Sydney to hull.

why were you going

Who said 1 game was mid-season?

Where does it land in Hull?

TBF I've given him 3 years. It takes a lot to rile me, but when I lose it, I lose it.

Just got back from Gold Coast.

so then jamie lyon could be a decent signing depends on whitings form wether he would get in the team but would provide good backup, what was the weather like then in gold coast then

28 degrees and sunny mate.

its alright for some

I say is it for real or BS?

We go to pretty much every game but I flat out refused to go to Cardiff this year despite constant nagging

unless we signed Rangi Chase. I was 100% certain I wouldn't need to book a hotel



I just literally cant motivate myself to get excited about going to watch us play. All the talk is about 2012 so why even bother with this season? Oh and if people seriously believe we have some world class half backs lined up for 2012 they really are delusional.

Surely this makes no difference with a salary cap? We're assured we spend to it, after all.

And Mrs B, you were great.

Er, you.

errr no I didn't. I said I don't like to see coaches leave mid-season but I'm fed up with Agar. The inference being that if we get rid of him mid-season I would be in favour of the decision. Try to keep up.

So, you're fed up now, but want to wait until mid-season?

I've been fed up for 2 years.

No way in hell are the board sacking Agar after one game, IF he goes it will be mid-season at the earliest hence my statement. Instead of trying to get one up how about reading what is actually written?

I haven't tried to get one up. The way it read was that you wanted rid now, but don't like to lose a coach mid season. I do apologise if i've read it wrong.

Although, you can't seriously believe that the board hire Agar because he's less trouble?

I've wanted rid for quite a while. Apology accepted.

I dont think they hired him based on that but I have my suspicions that he has been given far more benefit of the doubt than recent coaches partly due to the fact he is a yes man who isn't particularly demanding of the board. Just my impression and I may well be wrong.

Is he a yes man though, you don't get the board to suddenly spend £150k on a player if he does as he's told?

Unless it was the boards idea? Are they recouping that money by not spending the salary cap aswell?

Again no evidence of this, its just a thought.

so when we shell money out for a player its because the board want him? No credit for agar and scouts doing the work, then asking the board for the money? So when hull win its the players when we lose its agar.... your one of them?

One of what? I simply gave a scenario in which Agar could be a yes man and the club still pay a fee for a player. I even stated I had no evidence of this being the case. How about you get over yourself.

why would it be the boards idea to shell out for a player the coach hasnt asked for..... unless your hudge the grudge

Dont ask me, I thought it was a bad idea in the first place