I think he was using a fictional figure to illustrate how these loans work.

I was going to say…

In his fifth season, well established, 24 years old - must have 50 odd super league games ?

Experience & physical maturity not surprisingly ahead of the younger guys which will be reflected in his contract. I am a big fan & really hope the club don't dispense with him. Hopefully just salary cap issues the club needs to juggle at the mo ?

Wakefield might not even be paying that, it could be that Hull are basically paying Wakefield to have Hadley on their cap and play for them

I saw him outside the ground last night with his family. He was wearing his Hull FC club gear so maybe his wakey stint is over?

Wakefield Trinity‏Verified account @WTrinityRL 7m7 minutes ago
More
Chris Chester has just confirmed in his press conference that @DeanHadley17 has extended his loan deal by another month.

Not a surprise, I'd have brought him back, but I suppose within Ellis, Houghton, Watts and Bowden back next week and the young lads doing well it makes sense.

I'm not sure it makes much sense but I don't think we have an option with the salary cap

Or then maybe not

A real shame IMO, but on the plus side Brad Fash has seized his opportunity with both hands.

You would imagine Hadley unlikely to earn more than 4k a month (give or take) which is a pretty marginal impact on salary cap.

Hopefully it is because he is getting regular games with long minutes which Radford thinks he really needs at this stage of his career.

At Hull even if in 17 he would likely get less minutes, which is more suitable for someone like Turgut who is just starting out. Hopefully in the mid to long term it will benefit all concerned.

Quite possible. It wouldn't surprise me at all if this was the case.

We must have known of any potential cap issues going in to the season, and nothing has changed. Can only think it may be a fall out?

I think it's just good man management to have him at Wakefield. He wouldn't get as much playing time with us at the minute. He goes there and plays much more minutes and comes back to us game hardened and ready to take the place if whoever retires of moves on. As for Fash well that's just one massive bonus if he remains consistent. Downs and Turgut look handy as well. I don't think we need to worry at all about the situation.

I thought with the live cap you couldn't sign any player that would take you over the cap so I don't see how we could be over it but I can't see any other reason he'd have been there with our recent injury problems. Like I said, I saw him at the KC on Friday in his FC gear so I don't think there's been a fall out

Really disappointing for the player if true

On loan at Wakey for a further month should be fit to play Leeds this week according to reports.

Well at least he's gonna get plenty of game time. Hope to see him back at fc next year

It's a ridiculous situation that we've got ourselves into where we can't actually fit all of our contracted players under the salary cap. We must be paying some serious wedge to some players. Wakey had 8 missing against salford and still managed to field a team good enough to win and I bet they're still well under the cap

What 8 players did Wakey have missing.

I think we are at cap as Radford has assembled a good squad on paper, the players we have in key positions will be on good wages, Shaul, Kelly, Sneyd, Taylor, Watts, Houghton, Manu, Mini and Ellis will all be on door salaries, add to this trying to run a reserve team.

We had a lot of cap missing on sat and put in a good performance. We have been hit with injuries and suspensions this year but are still close to the top 5 and still in the cup and that's accredit to the squad Radford has built within the cap.

Grix, Tupou, Johnstone, Allgood, Miller, Walker, Arona, Kirmond.

We had plenty of cap missing in the previous 3 games which we lost. We have a good first 17 but beyond that only 2 or 3 with significant first team experience then we're into inexperienced kids. They've done OK this far and maybe 6+ first teamers will stretch any squad but it seems the way of the world now so we maybe need more depth to the squad moving forward or your season could be over before it begins

I think I am right in saying that somebody only counts on a clubs cap if he plays for them. At present Hadley hasnt played for Hull yet this season so has a cap figure of 0 for hull but as soon as he plays for them his full wage if he is in their top 25 earners counts on the cap and by all accounts would take hull over the cap.

I don't think the issue is the general wage bill, it's the winning bonuses that the CC squad received that's the issue from what I've heard.