Personally would not touch Wild, picking up lots in injuries and would rather let Burnett continue with hsi development.

Never used to like Robinson but he could do a good job mixing between the halves and hooker although with Horne, Long, Houghton and Berro already here one of them would have to leave to make signing him a possibility.

Wouldn't want Mathers,Westerman or Robinson,wouldn't improve the side one little bit.

Now I'd take a punt with LMS,has the potential to be a very good prop.

Mathers is a good player, playing very well at the moment, better FB than Tasney, but would allow Tansey to play 6.

Having Robinson would give us much needed cover for Long, if we had robinson this year we would have won a couple more game IMO.

It was a genuine question

Bingo.

Mathers is almost back to his Leeds form this season, I just don't think we are in the market for a fullback, I reckon Agar has Tansey down as the man for that role.

We won't sign Robinson whilst we have two halves and two hookers, unless one of them were to leave?

Me too, before he got injured he was on fire for us.

Or one of them moves into his state of origin position

Been 5 years or so since Berro played centre regularly, dont think hes got the pace for it these days

Back to his best. And played 24 games last season. As said, if we can only get him and Long on the park at the same time, we're set in the halves IMO.

Wouldn't go anywhere near Karl Pryce, absolute garbage. Leon Pryce would be a good signing, don't like him though, plus he's under contract for 2011. Fielden wouldn't be bad but only if he was on a small wage.

I'd move Berrigan to the centres next season, and have Houghton and Robinson to share the hooking role if possible. Horne has still got a lot to prove if he can be the first choice stand off next season, like someone said, Tansey at 6 and Mathers in at full back would be an improvement at the moment. Willing to give Horne a chance until end of the season when he's fully fit and alongside Long.

i second that opinion!

Why would we want mathers? Dumped by leeds, wigan and wire for a reason. If he was any good tehn wire wouldn't be using a quota spot an a 30 something aussies replacement

Would never keep up with Rich Whiting.

In any case Turner's best position to date for Hull has been centre and I'd like to see him given a good run there now.

That and the fact hes a prick

I know him therefore i was winding him up.



Are you Kosh mk2?

The 30 something Aussie who is the current Man of Steel, you mean?

That's the one. And?

Being replaced by Brett Hodgson hardly means Mathers isn't any good.

Agreed Paul, RH was in great form before the injury and will be again.. how fickle many are . I too am embarrassed by the comments against RH on here sometimes, if you knoew what that lad went through to play for his club you would not say that, he was just getting back to full fitness when injured again. .
Still one of SL stand out players when fit!!

[/u

and when he's a bit more consistent!!

Who said hodgsons replacing mathers?

Smiths already said he doesn't see hodgson playing every game and briers is missing a few games now so they could run with 1. Mathers 6. Briers or 1. Hodgson 6. Briers or 1. Mathers 6. Hodgson plenty of good cover in key postions.

I don't like Mathers. The challenge on Motu in Cardiff just summed him up in one play IMO.

mathers won't be going anywhere.

Edited for accuracy.