Quote ="Matt_Horton"Got a link?'" www.hullfc.com/article/22050/cat ... 14-hull-fc

Quote ="Matt_Horton"Got a link?'" www.hullfc.com/article/22050/cat ... 14-hull-fc

Cheers. Thank you.

There's no chance of Hull agreeing to a postponement and quite right too. It's their own fault they don't have a proper 19 because of their suspensions. i feel a little for Salford, but it's a little embarrassing them asking for a postponement just because they don't want to play their kids.

Absolutely ridiculous even asking the question! I cant believe they have had the cheek to ask you to postpone! Every team has injuries, every club has a 19's. Throw the kids in and see how they go. Cant see you guys even contemplating the stupid request (or if your decision makers have contemplated it then they are as daft as Salford are for asking).

Embarrassing of Salford to even ask. Get on with it and use your kids. Every club has had an injury crisis at some point and the suspensions are their fault.

I hope you tell Salford where to stick it.

On the BBC website it says part of the problem is that they have 4 banned players ! That is down to the way Harris wants them to play.

It will be a tough season and Hull have had plenty of injuries. A chance to get a win and boost points difference should not be missed.

IF HULL FC DONT WIN THIS FRIDAY (IF GAME GOES AHEAD) THEN THEIR IS SOMETHING WRONG

It's a bit naughty that, IMO. The fact that even Salford fans are saying it shouldn't happen backs that up. Their situation is unfortunate, but one that all clubs just have to accept on the rare occasions it happens.

Kind of forces us into a bad light unfairly, too. If we now refuse (as we should) we look like the bad guys trying to take advantage of their plight. If we happen to lose we'll then also be ridiculed.

Sky news are saying the match may be postponed now........

Anyone know if Salford have asked the RFL for this, because if they do I can see that bunch of halfwits agreeing

Your injury list is shocking but as you say the game should go ahead. We don't play in a pub league despite the fact our attacking structure may suggest otherwise.

It'll set a dodgy precedent if the RFL do postpone it.

The match either needs to go ahead with Salford playing a team of under 19's if they have to, or the match should be forfeited with a win for Hull and a fine for not fulfilling their fixture to Salford.

So do the suspended players play in the rearranged match? Just say no.

Harris can play. Providing Leeds/ Bradford or whoever has his playing contract agrees

Thin end of the wedge if this happens. As has been pointed out we struggled a few years back but got on with it.

Not our club's fault if another one messes up. Still we will have to score past them, so all isn't lost for the Doc.

hope it doesn`t bloody happen,i`ve booked my seat on the train today.

The request has been poiltely declined.

Looks like Paea won't be playing in this one, charged with two offences of raising knees, both grade B.

Surely a win is on the cards now...

Gareth Carvell also has joined them as welfare officer. Koukash should start at FB.

Get out clause....... Quote The Rugby Football League has been made aware of the request and said it would only step in if there was "a player welfare issue".'" www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... ury-crisis

Get out clause....... Quote The Rugby Football League has been made aware of the request and said it would only step in if there was "a player welfare issue".'" www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... ury-crisis

maybe to paper over the cracks, yes

salford are pathetic. They should be docked 2 points and forfeit the game for even asking

yea here here, plus it will save us from a shock defeat lol

You mean shock win?

The Hull board hear the Salford request this morning