So we should play youngsters who you think are ready in positions were quite well covered in, but ignore the one in ft training in a position we could be short in?

I'm with you.

Is Newton in ft training?

Stop being a pedantic git,it doesnt work...all im saying,is that actually seeing Newton play,he isnt ready for 1st team rugby as he has not got the build yet but that is just my opinion...if you have seen different all the way from Aus,then you are entitled to your opinion...the players i mentioned could play 1st team in my opinion and should have done v Oldham in the cup....the eay option would be to put Williams in at 7,Horne at 6 and Obst covering 9 but,also imo,Williams isnt ready either...i admit he has a great kicking game but little else....Its amazing what actually happens when you watch a match...i admit i havent seen anything of Mckinnon,Seymour and the other one but will take your opinion as you have actually seen them play.

I meant Williams as he's in ft training.

I've seen bits of the u20's play this season but don't really have to to not understand your point.



Quite simply our qualified coach doesn't believe their ready, that's why their not playing.

Your arguement just fell flat on its face with you saying our coach is qualified

Hasn't he done his coaching course?

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1g904.html

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1g904.html

''He's fit in really well and he's been impeccable off the field. He's a great, generous guy to have around and he's been popular.''
Seymour's resurgence at the Warriors is one of the NRL's best feel-good stories in recent times.
After having his contract with the Cronulla Sharks ripped up in 2009 after several alcohol-related incidents, the Warriors offered Seymour a lifeline on the condition he stay out of trouble. He has kept his word since arriving in Auckland late that year.

Not seen him play, Sheldon. What will he bring to the team (should we sign him) apart from impeccable behaviour?

I doubt a better 7 will sign for a sl club, His kicking game is average to good, good passing game, brings good experience and organisation and has great defence.

Cheers. Fingers crossed he replaces Long, then.

An average to good kicking game will be a big improvement on non existent to shoite

Even without Long, we have the capability to be so much better too. Tickle and Whiting can kick long, Horne and Obst can kick short and Westerman's OK as well. Why we almost always therefore get Horne to kick long on the last tackle is baffling.

Heremaia has a good kicking game from acting half.

I think his organisational skills and his defence will probably be more to the team than anything else .

So dropping him into NL 1 will be better to him than 30 mins in SL ?

I'd like him to bring his running style from his Broncos days as well!

He's suffered a few injuries while at the Broncos and that has taken a yard or two off his pace . He's still a decent H/B without ripping up any trees . I hope he goes well over here and the main thing is he stays fit and on the pitch for us.

seymour very much reminds me of dureau in most aspects of there game and i reckon he will go well for us and at a good age aswell.

All the makings of a very good signing if it happens.
The way things are, I'd have been happy with Robson or Smith so I'd be well chuffed if Seymour signs.
Most half backs that come across do so from the reserve grade. A first choice one will be a real coup.

Credit to "black and white" for posting the single funniest rumour and reply on [url=http://viewtopic.php?f=28&t=497968this thread[/url

Lack of planning and organisation

the coach is to blame surely he recognises that whiting and westerman have a better long kcicking game then bloody obst and horne who are awfull at long kicking.

I'm not sure he even recognises that white egg shaped thing the players throw to each other

Out of any of our signings for next year can any of them reach touch/ gain decent metres from a penalty, something we seem to lack!

It's not egg shaped, it's a prolate spheroid.