His subsequent coaching record suggests otherwise. However we were half decent to watch thanks to the players he did bring in that had some flair.

Aye , I think Phil clark emphasized that in a piece before Quins home game. We nearly scored twice as many tries under McCrea than we have under Agar.

It says rovers not us !!!

Carvell, Raynor, Kingy and Yeaman I think all improved under Bomber to some extent and as you mentioned Rich Horne and Paul Cooke who clearly did. The main difference back then was there was a plan B + C and even a D, the team played entertaining and expansive rugby. I site one of the final games at the Boulevard against Saints when they only managed to win by a whitewashed head. Daylight, Robinson, Felch, Maiden, Bird, Maher, Grima they brought us hope back then and where a whole lot more entertaining then paid stars that the so called high adorn our ( I was going to say pitch) treatment room.

We have not been playing entertaining rugby for some years now, its being coached out of them for some reason. Now some people might say winning is all important, there wrong but they can say it. We have seen some corking matches and got beat, the Hull v Leeds SL game at the KC around 2005 that was nil nil at half time. That was one best matches I have seen and we only just lost it near the end.

I would happily go back to that rugby

I would happily go back to that, at least you went away seeing a good game the majority of the time, whereas now you feel lucky to see a good entertaining display.

Not sure whether bomber had restrictions when he went back to Aus to coach but to look at his record whilst at Salford is wrong. They are operating at roughly half of the cap and the fact they have got a couple of wins is a minor miracle itself.

Its Dobson all over again!

They'll get Finch and Agar will have misheard those voices in his head and will play Fitz halves!

I said decent, not great. It was time for him to leave and a missed opportunity that we haven't appointed teh right man since

There's no chance we'll sign finch. We have 2 half backs signed for next year on big salaries. We all know they'll hardly play but the club won't sign a 3rd half back on big money. They can't

Of course they can't, this board don't have the balls.

long finch and horne would cost in excess of 25% of the salary cap. Never gonna happen

Unless long has told them he can't do another year ?

and miss out on his pension topup??

Or maybe even Horne?

It's about doing what's best for the team, and if that means replacing either Long or Horne with Finch, so be it.

Beat me to it

if we paid either off it would still count on the cap,so won't happen.

unless long goes to be assistant coach on his 2nd year? then his wages wont count?

Talking of rumours. I've noticed that Expro hasn't posted today, coincidentally the Team/Club flew out to France today!!

has our name even being linked to finch ?

No idea, but having an exciting dynamic player in Finch is not in Agars thinking.

did no-one realise agar is bigger than the club?

Well Agar must have incriminating evidence on the board to still be head coach and get a new contract

[urlhttp://www.sporthull.co.uk/headlines/Hull-KR-Morgan-hopeful-retaining-Galea/article-2154561-detail/article.html[/url

I hope you succeed Mr. Morgan!

i hope god is listening!!