You better hope that Crooks doesn't play on Sunday, otherwise your argument is in bits. Either way, I think that you are wrong. Whilst his defence isn't brilliant, it's not the disaster you're making it out to be.

I also agree with others, Pitts is the more baffling omission if he's fit, just seems bizarre.

Aye, Kayla is gorgeous!

Don't feel like answering the question then? Mincemeat!

Someone asked James Smailes on Twitter if Pitts was going to get a look in this week, he replied 'doubt it'. Indicates to me that there's more to it.

Actually, he replied "I'd say slim, but we'll see" when asked about the chances of Pitts playing, which could imply almost anything.

Ah right, knew it was something like that. I think it's a little naive to say it could imply anything though, given the decimation of our front row and subsequent shuffling around and inclusion of two relatively inexperienced back rowers.

Crooks was dropped through bad form, & I am suprised he isn't this week, pitts is a decent squad player & he should be in this week whilst our 1st choice forwards are out but the coach must see something different on the training park.

Put your miller sock back under your bed & don't forget to kiss his picture goodnight..petal.

Is pitts injured? Didn't he do OK in his one appearance?

miller isn't very good which his fan club seem to ignore, although there must come a point where it's worth trying him.

Still no answer then? I'll ignore your little comments and assume you haven't got a clue, as usual.

pitts isn't 100% fit, & I've heard windy miller as got a restraining order on you! #obsessed.

Would make sense as he hasn't been in the Donny squad the last couple of weeks either IIRC.

What IF Dobson became available?

Grow up daft lad.....he is entitled to a opinion and yours about Miller being gash is ott.....you can't be gash if you play in the NRL ......he is either worth a try or release him.id sooner have him than Gale

But hes not good enough to play..why isnt AP asking radders to play him if hes paying him a wage? because hes not good enough..in 2 & a bit seasons at wests 1st grade he played 9 times..hardly a glittering career is it? he came because of Gentle saying hes the next best thing.. & as we needed a SH..AP just signed him blindfolded!! says it all for miller dosent it as we tried to sign Gale. & i never said he cant have an opinion..i just told him Miller is no good for our team.

Does anyone think radford wouldn't be playing miller if he was the best option we have at SH?

Bang on the money JTP!!

I thought Miller hade something last season to kick on this season but for whatever reason he has not had a chance. Maybe he does not fit in Radders plans. As it is he either gives Miller a chance instead of him stuck on the sidelines or Hull release him. His situation is not doing anyone any good and it needs sorting quick.

Miller was a 21 year old kid who came across half the world mid season to play the hardest position on the field. In a down in confidence team, behind a small getting spanked every week pack, with a disinterested half back partner!
Far far to early to right him off for me, and since he has history with rankin I'd like to see him have a run or 2.
When we have a full pack a backline up of
1 shaul
2 lineham
3 crooks
4 yeaman
5 binman
6 rankin
7 Miller
Looks okay to me, has potent try scoring ability, line breaking ability, speed power size and elusiveness. The big question is again can the halves prompt probe and kick sufficiently. Worth finding out with them though instead of using a top class 9 at scrum half!

Also on a side note Miller in this corresponding fixture last year was man of the match

Nice to see someone else with a bit of common sense.

I like that back line, but I'd put Horne at 6, Rankin to FB and leave Shaul out.

So now our coaching staff have no common sense.

No, just you.

Why? I don't leave miller out of the team..I just told you the reason why..you just don't like it because you rate him..shame wests didn't or our coaching staff.

Why cant people get it into their thick heads - Miller is ! He maybe does one or two good things a game if hes lucky then the rest of the time gets steam rollered or runs round like a headless chicken! Another example of Gentle thinking he can polish a turd when he clearly coudnt.

I hope Miller does get the message and goes elsewhere as im sure there miles better around than him and Radford obviously thinks the same

So the reason he isn't getting picked is because he can't defend? If that's the case then I'd like to ask you a few further questions. Firstly, if that's the requirements for a spot, then how come Ben Crooks is getting a game? Secondly, if he's that bad why was our defence better last year when he was in the team?

Fact of the matter is Horne & Heremaia in the halves doesn't work against the better teams (or most teams for that matter), what's that saying about doing the same thing and expecting a different result?

Doesn't matter what I ask though does it? Because you won't have an answer and will just go down the childish remark route. Reckon Seb does more for my argument anyway!