I reckon if every decision was looked at, we would see that a very high percentage are correct. The problem, as has been identified on previous threads, and particularly so with the Wigan Hudds game. Is that there is no consistency, and what is given as a penalty in one moment, is ignored in another.
They did get the Sneyd conversion one wrong though.

I knew you'd be on with your overtly biased opinion on the game. Fact is that wakey needed piggy backing up the field with penalites or errors from us. Other than that you struggled to make decent yardage. Other than a 20 minute or so spell when we went to sleep we completely dominated you.

Stats

Metres made

wakey 941 Hull 1377

Carries

wakey 144 Hull 170

Average gain

wakey 6.5m Hull 8.1m

Average no of players in the tackle

wakey 1.7 Hull 1.9

wakey - 1 player over 90m made in the game

Hull - 8 players ove 90m made in the game.

We dominated you and the scoreline doesn't reflect that domination due to a brief spell when our defence slackened off . Accept it or try and argue otherwise, I don't really care but facts are facts.

I'm not saying wakey didn't play well because they did but never in a million years were you the better side

I always find wakey fans to be very balanced - chips on both shoulders most of 'em







It's like the RL equivalent of small man syndrome. Strange how cas fans are from the same town and they're generally OK

Edited for fun.

Funny how that works for Hull also.

Well done Jake. You've shown them how to make a funny!!

"Them"?

The man held motionless was trying to offload and had his arm free when Ellis hit him. Or was he supposed to stand there and watch?

This has been blown up out of all proportion. Talanoa suffered a worse hit by Ablett on Friday and no, I wasn't up in arms about it. Neither did our chairman embarrass himself on social media.


He needs to join the very long queue of people hacked off at the ineptitude and outright bias of the panel. It's hardly exclusive for Wakefield to suffer ridiculous decisions. Tonight's is just another example in fact.

How I saw it. Never ever in a million years was pritchard to Shaul forward. That would of taken the score over 50.plus the goal that was but wasn't takes it to possibly 54. So being a bit tighter for that spell really could of hit 60 odd. Either way I've never ever ever seen a team score 40odd points keep a side to 4 points in the 2nd and be anything other than dominant

Or how a team which makes less than 1000 metres in a game deserves anything but a hammering. Had our defence not gone to sleep in that 2nd 1/4 the scoreline would have been more reflective of our dominance

If my grandma had balls she'd be my grandad, so what's your point?

Tbf they could say the same about the 10 minutes in which we scored 4 tries in the first half.

My point is we were dominant despite what any wakey fan might try and convince themselves. Sub 1000m gains are the things that hammerings are made of

or a shemale

She'd fit in well in Hull then!

Last time I went out in Wakey I thought they were remaking Priscilla Queen of the Dessert!!

Good (close) wins for both our sides last night. Let's move on from this and enjoy eh?

Spot on. Its been a good year so far for both of us.

If your Grandma had balls, you'd have 3 grandads and you wouldn't be here to make stupid comments.

Indeed, we're the pride of Yorkshire at the moment!

Not that old "Yorkshire/Humberside" tosh is it?

I think he meant both teams

Aaaaahhhh. Soz

Haha no - none of that tosh, I meant both teams.

That was a good win for you against a good Catalans team hope you can kick on from here and shake up that top 4 and win it all the best and keep coming to belle vue in your 100's we like your money