I do it every year. I phone Sky and tell them I'm cancelling and switching to BT Vision because I have BT phone & broadband, so I may as well just pay one bill. They always come back with a 50% discount.

I then phone BT and tell them I'm switching my broadband and phone to Sky and they give me 33% discount. Thankfully the chimps employed in BT's call centres seem unaware that Wincanton's phone system is incapable of handling Sky phone & broadband

I cancelled hd and sports at the end of last season. A couple of months ago the gave me had for £2 a month for 12 months. and have now given me sports half price for 6 months

Quote ="Standee"expatshield is your friend, google it.'" Another good VPN is www.hidemyass.com/

Quote ="Standee"expatshield is your friend, google it.'" Another good VPN is www.hidemyass.com/

How much is your internet per month?, if you're streaming from the internet, it must 'eat' your usage allowance.

Cheers

Mike

I didn't get rid of Sky because I couldn't afford it, I got rid because I despise Rupert Murdoch and all he stands for. The thought of increasing his wealth, however minimally, just didn't sit right.

as others have said the smart dns is needed to view the site

as for billing address I used admcsports last year for premier league games and will most likely re activate my al jazeera sports account for for next season not once have i had any issues

smart dns works on pretty much any device from tablets to smart tvs but it only works from 1 connection at a time.

all of the services I have used have had mobile apps too

Assuming next years prices are the same as this year and as rumoured al jazeera get premier league rights,

for under £20 per month I'll have access to all sky sl games at least 2 nrl games a week, all 380 premier league games all champions league england games and all from official high quality streams with english commentary.

Quick complain about Sky going up,

But dont you dare mention Hull FC now bringing 4 shirts a year out at £47 a time

Neither Sky Nor Hull FC shirts are something you are forced to buy.

how much is your internet per month?

£18 for 100gb with free phone line

thats cheap, who's it with?, do you use over 100gb a month?

mines £25 for 35gb a month, and IF i go over my limit, its £2 per gig.

Cheers

Quote ="weaver93"thats cheap, who's it with?, do you use over 100gb a month? mines £25 for 35gb a month, and IF i go over my limit, its £2 per gig. Cheers'" with these hull.connexin.co.uk/packages/residential-lite. Na I never go over 100gb I was paying £25 for 200gb but when I looked at my usage I realised i'd be fine on cheaper package.

Quote ="weaver93"thats cheap, who's it with?, do you use over 100gb a month? mines £25 for 35gb a month, and IF i go over my limit, its £2 per gig. Cheers'" with these hull.connexin.co.uk/packages/residential-lite. Na I never go over 100gb I was paying £25 for 200gb but when I looked at my usage I realised i'd be fine on cheaper package.

Quote ="clubfoot fc"with these hull.connexin.co.uk/packages/residential-lite. Na I never go over 100gb I was paying £25 for 200gb but when I looked at my usage I realised i'd be fine on cheaper package.'" Cheers for the info mate, just looked on their website , jeez £150 for setup

Quote ="clubfoot fc"with these hull.connexin.co.uk/packages/residential-lite. Na I never go over 100gb I was paying £25 for 200gb but when I looked at my usage I realised i'd be fine on cheaper package.'" Cheers for the info mate, just looked on their website , jeez £150 for setup

Agreed it's really out of order that your not allowed into the KC without purchasing all 4 shirts, scandalous really!

Sky go us the future!!i cancelled mine over a yr ago,just tap up an elderly relative who will not use it log into their account. Free sky sports!!!

Do you shoplift your food instead of buying it too?

Because there's little difference in what you are suggesting. "Free sky sports" is only free to you because you are gaming the system but it's the rest of the subscribers who are subsidising your dishonesty

yup although me saving £12.50 per month line rental made it easier

connexin often half 1/2 price install offers too







there is a big difference actually
shoplifting is illegal using a relatives sky go account isnt.

breaking terms and conditions with sky isn't illegal

Complete rubbish, his relative is subsidising it not you, your paying for your own subcription.

The bill payer pays to be able to register their account on a set number of devices, it's up to them which devices the choose.

And who gives a sh*t anyway? Murdoch seems to think he can get away with breaking as many laws as he likes and trying to govern the country by proxy. If someone gets one over on him from time to time, good on them, I say.

To be fair, Murdoch owns a relatively small amount of sky. News Corp own about 39% of BSKYB and Murdoch holds about 12% of News Corp.

It is actually. Its covered by the copyrights and patents act.

However much he might own, he has great influence within both organisations.

Not sure there's even an issue, anyway. Under the SkyGo terms and conditions, provision is made for 'additional users'. As long as you don't exceed your number of devices, I can't see a problem with one of those users living in another house.

isn't that only to do with reproducing the stream or charging for access? not with regards to which device you choose as 1 of your 2 devices/

There is an offence under the copyright and patents act of dishonest reception of a broadcast with intent to avoid payment.
The fact someone else, somewhere else is paying correctly isn’t a defence for you.

Im not a solicitor or sky though so im not saying you are going to prison or anything, just the principle isn’t just breach of contract.

It is if they're not exceeding their number of devices, I would have thought.

For example, if my father chooses my laptop as one of his devices so that he may watch Sky when he stays at my house (which he does fairly regularly), I don't think there's any way Sky can say that the content may only be viewed if my father is present. How would they prove it anyway?