Not really, he's ooc and were heavily linked with Crookes.

They're were rumours that Seymour was off at the end pf the year.

Now that would be good!

Ellis?

Yea been told gentle is looking to move seymore on and that's the partnership we want!!

Adam Heremaia?

Not doubting your info but imo Seymour is a better player than Holdsworth.

It could be financial.

Id rather have seymour aswell

I was told a month or so back that Sharp has been told he won't be required from next season.

Me three,I think seymore and brough would be a very good partnership,we'll see what happens

would love brough but cant see it they want a kings ransom for him.

Was thinking that myself when we've been linked with them both , because they was rumours on here a while ago about Seymour wanting out .

Thought was more Hull wanting him out

Just cant see Brough coming.

I wouldn't be to sure.

to much cash wanted

Do a deal including Tickle. He isn't signing a new contract, he wants away. So what is the point of keeping him for next season only for him to leave for free at the end of it. Their is a deal to be done if the club's put their heads together. IMO of course.

Well if we sell Tickle to Widnes for what is rumoured a large sum, we may have the cash available to bring him in. Not that I want us to offload Tickle, but Brough is far more needed.

Whoops! Give me a break, I forgot he was in the team at all!

I'd find out what Hudds want for Brough, then tell Widnes they can have Tickle for the same amount.

Simples.

Back rower with a year left and a Half-back with 3 + doesn't add up.

fc know how much they want as im told we have enquired about him,seems fc want him and he wants to come but they want a kings ransom

This situation nearly always results in the player leaving.

Hope your right

Possibly not, but Widnes seem to want Tickle and we have no need to sell so we can at least try it.