Be careful you don`t get done for defamation of character.

"....IN ANYYYYYYY KIND OF WEATHER............"

That only applies if it's not true

And the idiots keep on coming

Ah!

Glad you are getting into the spirit of things.Join in singing with us anytime.

Rovers have an endless supply of them. Don't expect it to stop any time soon.

Hull Kingston Rovers Average Attendance - LHF Healthplan National League One 2006 = 3,389

Hull Kingston Rovers Average Attendance - Engage Super League 2007 = 7,157

Lifelong fans

and the barcoders gate for today was

How are your attendances fairing this season....No doubt massive with the capture of Big Willie 'eh....I suggest you look at your own fickle supporters before you make pathetic comments towards ours

About 4,000 less than your break-even requirement but we can afford it

Rubbish and you know it. We have 8.5k average gates take 1-2k away for most games & give the RFL & RL a derby that's well supported each year. I don't think many fans will actually believe your statement as it holds no weight at all.

Not far off your attendance against Huddersfield the other week



By the way, Hull KR v Sheffield, Challenge Cup 4th Round 2009 - attendance 4,955

We managed very well before you lot came up and will mange if you lot go



As for the derby.......its just another game and 2pts...simple as that....just think...its you lot who put us where we are....Barry Lilley is a god.

You completely missed the issue here and went on a wayward spiel. No change there then.

No i havent....i for one,wouldnt miss the derby or you lot being in superleague.....as for a wayward spiel...last i looked its the FC board and il spiel as much as i like about you lot of inbred w@nkers as i like.

I love your way with words.

Not far off your average SL attendances...and against a Championship 1 side

True but the price is the price. What makes me laugh is the number of people on here who are complaining but have said wouldnt go if it was a pound entry!

I'm not going because of your club and fans stance of backing racists and criminals, and your unwavering support of violent crime. If I got to actually watch the game when I was there, I may have to make a moral decision.

Excuse me? care to elaborate on your outlandish claims? my post was tongue in cheek, yours is out of order.

Laugh again then, I personally would'nt go if rovers PAID ME £20.

and the fish has bitten ( codead ) love it reel them in

Last season at the last CP derby we were in the Golf stand with about 1/3 Hull, 1/3 Rovers and 1/3 empty. South "stand" had about 500 Hull. Assuming a similar pattern happens this year, then at 2011 prices:

Guestimate income =#004040800 @ £18 North plus =#004040500 @ £20 South = £14400+£10000==#004040[u£24000.[/u

If Hull was given the North stand for the derby as is the case for all other away fans the Golf stand would sell out, and say the 400 or so Rovers fans who were in the Golf stand last year had to "view " from the South "stand" then:

Guestimate income =#0000401300 @ £18 North plus =#004040400 @ £20 South = £23400+£8000 = =#004040[u£31400[/u

It does not make economic sense to persist in forcing Hull fans onto the ferries at inflated prices. It's almost enough to make you think Hudge is a bit unbalanced when it comes to Hull.

It would also be interesting to see how many Rovers fans would pay £20 to stand in the South "stand" given the second scenario. I know I'm been disingenuous here, though. Of [icourse[/i they'd "rally round the Robins" whether it's hailing or calm in the Humber, binoculars at the ready to support their team come what may.

It's not about money. It's about having as few Hull fans in the stadium as possible on game day