Quiet again, although Sam Moa manages 3 NFA's... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/54 ... iew-panel-

Quiet again, although Sam Moa manages 3 NFA's... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/54 ... iew-panel-

He seems to be becoming one of the untouchables.

Quote ="ccs"Quiet again, although Sam Moa manages 3 NFA's... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/54 ... iew-panel-'" ccs did you see Paulo from Saints running like a demented windmill at Robert Hicks, Jake Connor must have really said a bad word to the ref, in our preseason friendly.

Quote ="ccs"Quiet again, although Sam Moa manages 3 NFA's... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/54 ... iew-panel-'" ccs did you see Paulo from Saints running like a demented windmill at Robert Hicks, Jake Connor must have really said a bad word to the ref, in our preseason friendly.

No, I'm sky-less, fortunately, so missed it.
Was it on the superleague show? I haven't seen that either.

We was home for the Sunday games on Sky, it must have been, as I also have not watched SL show for obvious reasons.

He was threatening and aggressive, but Hicks told him off



And the discom deemed it was ok.

Yes, no longer with FC

Statement from the Disciplinary and Match review panel.

Clubs will never agree with every decision of the panel, but we always hope that club officials will respect the disciplinary process and the integrity of individual panel members.

Officials and supporters are reminded that the match review panel and the disciplinary tribunal are independent, the findings of this two-stage process are transparent and published on the RFL website, and processes are under constant peer-review.

The panel and its processes were reviewed during 2017 by a working group which included senior representatives from both Super League and Championship clubs who commended the quality of the work. The individuals involved on the match review panel and the disciplinary tribunal all bring considerable expertise, including experience of playing or officiating at the highest level. The disciplinary tribunals are chaired by current or former Judges.

Members of both the match review panel and the disciplinary panel work on behalf of the whole sport, to give back to the sport, and they have and deserve our full respect and support.



Someone’s rattled the establishment, I wonder who.

Think Hudgell has been having a go since Joel Tomkins ban has been upheld.

Quote ="Riderofthepalehorse" Someone’s rattled the establishment, I wonder who.'" Hudgell. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... ll-2917510

Quote ="Riderofthepalehorse" Someone’s rattled the establishment, I wonder who.'" Hudgell. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... ll-2917510

Quote ="shauney"Hudgell. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... ll-2917510'" Reckon they’ll lose against Warrington now he’s out

Quote ="shauney"Hudgell. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... ll-2917510'" Reckon they’ll lose against Warrington now he’s out

Both Hull clubs get a bad deal, of this I’m sure we’re in agreement as rival fans. Scott Taylor for yourselves has been on the end of some very poor outcomes this season alone.

Did roby get punished for his crusher tackle ? . Hudgell is right in what he's saying .

No, this is codswallop.

There is no conspiracy against either Hull or Rovers.

It's embarrassing when people claim that there is.

I can see why cudgel is unhappy that a process overseen by a former warringtpn player and coach sees his club captain banned for a game against warrington

I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that the crusher tackle ruling has been changed.

If the player in possession turns in the tackle and continues gaining ground moving "backwards", then he's taking more of a risk of suffering a crusher tackle.
It would still be an offence if committed, but is now treated more leniently.

So there are now crusher tackles and crusher tackles, depending on …...

Yes, Warrington need all the help they can in beating Hull KR.

So do you think that no-one should be part of a disciplinary panel if anyone playing in a game they are reviewing are due to play a club the panelist has been involved with sometime over the last, say, twenty years?

Yeah. It's like a judge presiding over a case involving his mate

It's only an issue for Hudgell when it directly impacts Rovers, thereby looking like sour grapes - see Justin Poore, John Boudebza etc.

Wasnt hudgell overseeing some revamp of the disciplinary process?

Correct, he did last year. Maybe if he'd made recommendations about who could execute it, disqualifying anyone with any previous affiliation to any club biu still with on depth technical knowledge of the game at the top level, this could have been avoided.

Fairly quiet, although Paea gets 2 more warnings for use of knees. https://www.rugby-league.com/article/55 ... view-panel

Fairly quiet, although Paea gets 2 more warnings for use of knees. https://www.rugby-league.com/article/55 ... view-panel

2 warrington players banned. If lineham had been sent off as he should have been wed likely be playing rovers in the semi

Agreed and I’m just amazed at how yet again Chris Hill escapes any form of punishment

That may well happen in the semi, particularly if Connor gets in his face. Not sure Hill is a popular player with other teams, a bit like Joel Tompkins, not supposed to be tackled and tries to intimidate the ref. I remember a few years ago, FC went out to ruffle Tompkins feathers in an away game and he was sin binned, just couldn’t take it.

Harsh on Rovers for Lineham to only get 10 minutes in the game, when the panel deem it to be worthy of 240 minutes of non playing time.

Is there a case now for 1 of the games of the ban to be against the team the offence was against so they actually do get some benefit? So 2 games for Lineham now, and then his last game in the next game Vs. Rovers?