What the hell was that!

Nasty, arrogant player. Bye bye.

So Conner now Gale banned, nasty Hull

He should’ve retired two seasons ago.

couldn't have happened to a nicer player!

Was mixing it with us last week

Should be a long ban.

Just a good job he didnt connect a little higher.
Certainly an "unusual" challenge

so was Connor.....no surprise there though.
Connor was instrumental in 3 tries, so I guess he could blow his own trumpet, but he was goading TJ after one of them.
Should be carded for it tbh, celebrate with your team mates by all means but don't be a pr1ck about it.

One of those players that you love to hate. I noticed that he was doing a bit of refereeing as well early in the game. Wouldn't have minded him at BV a couple of seasons ago though

So as I thought he plays against us and is now set to miss several games for Hull (albeit through disciplinary issues).

And your point is what exactly?

Think what he is trying to say,He always play's well against us .When we played them did enough to win the game for Hull. .

He predicted he would play against us and then be injured and be out for weeks.
Kinda got it right.

Did he have an injury problem prior to playing us?

Potential 8 game ban, albeit for two separate incidents.

Interesting times with the disciplinary panel.

The disciplinary will settle down in a few weeks time.
Clearly, "we" are trying to take some of the cynical challenges out of the game, which has to be a good thing in the long term.

As for Gale, he seemed to lose his judgment before the offence that got him carded.
I commented to the lad that he looked like he would do something daft and he duly obliged.

He's been great at Cas but looks like he could be on the "downslope", which will only serve to increase his frustration.

No need to reply to my post as Gale wasn't injured prior to the Hull game, which makes me wonder why he would predict he would play against us and then get injured, what's so special about Gale, maybe he got mistaken with Connor eh?

I think you are reading way too much into this.

Gale has played us before and managed to get on the field half fit, win the game, then not play for ages.
Wilzay was just making a joke about it that came true in a different way.
There is no conspiracy and his joke certainly didn't deserve disecting to this level.

I did not know I was dissecting anything to any level!, first of all I'm not reading too much into anything either, I could not understand wilzays post and asked him for an explanation, you then jumped in and defended his post with a half hearted explanation about it being a joke, then I simply asked if he was injured which you ignored, I then offered an explanation that he might have 2 players mixed up simple as that, whether wilzay was making a joke which fwiw I don't believe, once again you've jumped in and prolonged the question asked, and I'm afraid if anybody is guilty of dissecting his post it's your good self.

I agree my bad. Should have just left it hanging.

Gale got 5 games

Someone needs to run out onto the KCOM pitch and tell Lomax he can get up off the floor now.

It's nothing to do with Lomax for me.
He clearly caught him but the point is he did something dangerous.
If you dump someone on their head you shouldn't get a lighter ban if you don't break their neck.


And then he made it worse by trying to pick him up when he's down injured which not only could it make an injury worse ( but not really in this case) but it incites a fight.

Got the minimum. He should be happy.

The only one who knows the intent is Gale, the disciplinary must make assumptions based on what they see. The two problems were that his leg was extended towards Lomax and he lead with his foot up so any contract would be stud first.
The thing you must ask yourself is if he had made the same tackle against a Wakefield player what opinion would you have.