Crowther another amazing performance....
Give me annakin anyday.
He played well against shudds.away when he tackled a few players. I'm all for Wakey youth but I'm.sorry he's not shown a too Bob bit to me

Poptart can you lock this or better put it as a sticky so he can continue to post his bile weekly rather than start new ones.

Why lock.it I'm.contributing.


Annakin or crowther
.
Annakin gets my vote

How can I put this ....... SHUT UP YOU FOOL AND GO AWAY !!!!!!!!

U were quick to reel me in after Huddersfield away..

Take it on the chin pal cos he's been useless since. Would gladly eat my words more shudds performances away

Ban me but this tool is a (edited.....don't do that. I'll think about your request Poptart)

You really need to find the tree closest to where you live. Walk up to it and sincerely apologise to it for wasting the oxygen it is producing for you to waste.

You do realise Annakin has been injured for the last few weeks don't you squire???

3 times you've started a thread against one player which is excessive! Your opinion about Annakin is your choice and put that on the game thread. We also get you don't like Chester. I'm sure you could get a gig as JDs sidekick if you ever got your way

I see what your doing here

You've deliberately brought this up to draw their attention from today's debacle.

Crowther is way down the list of players to drop as far as I am concerned. Gives his all every week and to a decent standard - a few better paid and more experienced players could take a leaf out his book

Crowther puts a lot of the more experienced forwards to shame week in week out.

So, much as this thread irritates me too, it doesn't actually on it's own contravene the AUP.
He hasn't exactly swayed from his criticism of Crowther in the past so I can't say it is not his honest view and he is entitled to his opinion.

For those that reply, 1) put him on ignore, it will make all our lives easier and 2) prove him wrong rather than call him names that will get you in to trouble because that often does contravene the AUP. (AUP can be found in the Help menu at the top of the page)

Saying that, if another thread targeting this particular player is created, without any actual evidence to support the post I will treat is as contravening AUP section 3.2
i. Containing spam
n. Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person

Fair warning to all.