Giants have tweeted they are playing us on 20th Jan in a pre season friendly at BV. Does this mean a deal has been struck to stay there next season or are the Giants being presumptious on the venue?

Anyone heard owt?

One thing for sure is they won’t be playing any friendly’s on the hallowed premiership grass of the Town

I’m sure we’ll be at BV for the friendly’s and the coming season

MC v Manni on Tuesday, may the best man win

Tuesday???

Perhaps we are playing at Fart-town

I went there recently to watch a junior game, unrecognisable. Biggest pitch in the world though.

Anyone heard owt, was the meeting just regarding BV next season or beyond?
Up the Trin

I am hearing we have agreed to terms to paly at BV this coming season with talks about re development put on hold to next year.

And you just made that up when exactly. For someone who claims to be living in Sydney you don't half 'hear' a lot!

Don't dig a hole Vastman...you'll give him kudos he doesn't deserve, when it's announced we stay for 2018.

I don't see why talks would halt for a year though - makes no sense. Perhaps he means talks resume in 2018?

Never noticed the ignore button before, is that for anyone specifically?

The outcome of a legal action might have a bearing! Play at Belle Vue and see what happens re court action.

Box announced at today's council meeting that he has officials looking at details to go ahead with a stadium at Belle Vue with or with out an anchor tenant.

So the council will build a stadium even if they've got no one to use it?

Or have they?

I smell Rodders and his soccer club plan.
Is there any sports club in Wakefield who could potentially pay the 'commercial rent' they seem so keen to apply?

I would suggest this is just WMDC's hand in this game of poker. If they build a stadium, where else are WT going to play?

or maybe it's just a get out clause for their friends at Yorkcourt. £80m of planning gain in exchange for planting some posts in a field and building some changing rooms. Community Stadium sorted.

That's my worry, are they cleverly backing us into a corner, we say no to being anchor tenants, we walk away, the council build three 4G pitches, community facilities provided, council are heroes, Trinity are the greedy bad guys. Job done.

Wimbledon and MK Dons scenario on the horizon?

Why don't we see if they're really serious about building the stadium, agree to play there and negotiate once we are in. That's what other clubs have done renegotiated a more favourable deal once when it's obvious the original deal isn't working.

Up the Trin

I'd assume the council would want a signed watertight contract for us to be anchor tenants before construction could begin. Oh the irony.

I wondered that, but what's in it for Manni? No money to be made on a few 5-a-side soccer pitches. The council don't own the land, remember, and the council could probably do that at Thornes Park.

Build them at Newmarket?

I thought I'd read somewhere that Thornes had been promised to a developer for housing......Now who could that be?

But wasn't Box's comment about building it at Belle Vue? That can only be done if it benefits 88M. How it does so, and the identity of the tenant, is a different issue.

My suspicion is that it is a way of deflecting legal action and a hope that the terms will be negotiated somewhere in the middle.

If the council are serious about building a new stadium (ha!) then they have plenty of land in their ownership the off the WERR. Why build an asset on 3rd party land when you've got masses right there.