What a shame he might miss Sundays game through suspension...

Another positive Richie Moore is fully fit, more competition for the starting front rowers.

Is he really that dirty though? Always thought the referee's didn't give him a fair crack when he was with us.

A or and Wilkins up grade B offences Wilkins tackle on Riley was cowardly the ref put the whistle towards his mouth then decided not to blow and whilst Riley was out le the game play for several minutes disgraceful refereeing. I'll be very interested to see the result as this was right in front of Robey

With Saints injuries / no available half backs, At worst Wilkin will get a grade which carries 1 game, and he'll submit an early guilty plea and escape a ban. What is more likely, is a warning about his future tackling technique.

Jon Wilkin doesn't have an egp having taken one 11 months and 1 week ago. His actions were foolish in the extreme given our current problems in the area - I expect him to get 2 games now.

Wilkin is Grade B, no EGP available

Fantastic news!!!

Poore will definitely get 3 games. He's turning out to be exactly what we expected - a flamin liability.

is this on the RFL website?

Quote ="BelleVueLifer"is this on the RFL website?'" Not checked, but... www.loverugbyleague.com/news_145 ... um=twitter

Quote ="BelleVueLifer"is this on the RFL website?'" Not checked, but... www.loverugbyleague.com/news_145 ... um=twitter

Quote ="1873"Not checked, but... www.loverugbyleague.com/news_145 ... um=twitter'" don't reckless high tackles constitute red cards these days? after all, reckless is where someone doesn't care about the consequences of their actions.... why can someone sat in an office make a decision that 3 professional match officials cannot?

Quote ="1873"Not checked, but... www.loverugbyleague.com/news_145 ... um=twitter'" don't reckless high tackles constitute red cards these days? after all, reckless is where someone doesn't care about the consequences of their actions.... why can someone sat in an office make a decision that 3 professional match officials cannot?

Answer: because the game is a joke

Shame Poore wont play who on the KR side will give us a piggy back down field through a penalty now like Poore could.

Not suprised by this. Let us down far too many times last year for a "marquee" signing.

He's been half decent when he's been on the pitch that's the worst thing

Quote ="Trinity 61"Answer: because the game is a joke '" Seems Neil Hudgell agrees with you www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... e-Chairman

Quote ="Trinity 61"Answer: because the game is a joke '" Seems Neil Hudgell agrees with you www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... e-Chairman

Hudgell has some good points but using Poore in his rant was probably not the best.

Quote ="Aldy"Seems Neil Hudgell agrees with you www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... e-Chairman'" He is absolutley correct here in my opinion. If you watch the 2 videos the throw on Whiting looks far worse in my opinion.

Quote ="Aldy"Seems Neil Hudgell agrees with you www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... e-Chairman'" He is absolutley correct here in my opinion. If you watch the 2 videos the throw on Whiting looks far worse in my opinion.

Spot on. Identical situations, 3 man tackle. Whiting one - worse outcome but more lenient decision.
I fail to see how they can say that the Widnes one they can't identify a player so caution all 3, but Hull KR one they can clearly lay the blame on Poore.

Been some absolutely awful decisions by the match review commission this week.

Hardly a rant, Hudgell was comparing the tackle on Whiting to the one Poore was involved in and the fact none of the players in the Whiting tackle were charged

Its the RFL out for us again by giving Poore a ban we don't get marched down field by the penalty he would give us at most tackles.