Looks like some of the authors on the BMJ are also questioning the agendas being rolled out of this health crisis
[i
"Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.[/i"

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m44 ... aign=usage

Shall we consider the BMJ to be "conspiracy theorists" too?

Looks like some of the authors on the BMJ are also questioning the agendas being rolled out of this health crisis
[i
"Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.[/i"

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m44 ... aign=usage

Shall we consider the BMJ to be "conspiracy theorists" too?

Granted there maybe a few points that could be used for governments "supressing science" but this line made me laugh "The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE" - By that they mean that the government chief advisor attended a SAGE meeting LOL.

Also this article goes into the the DH with holding reports parts of a report on ethnic minorities and only posted it as there was an outcry, that is just not true in the slightest, when they published the report they stated there would be a follow up report, there was also a log of it on the GOV website on PM discussions, go back to the date it was published and read the audit of the phone calls, it is there for all to see.

Granted there maybe a few points that could be used for governments "supressing science" but this line made me laugh "The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE" - By that they mean that the government chief advisor attended a SAGE meeting LOL.

Also this article goes into the the DH with holding reports parts of a report on ethnic minorities and only posted it as there was an outcry, that is just not true in the slightest, when they published the report they stated there would be a follow up report, there was also a log of it on the GOV website on PM discussions, go back to the date it was published and read the audit of the phone calls, it is there for all to see.

The manufacturers of the Bills Vaccine Pfizer have been far from squeaky clean in past dealings.

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/ ... ent_090209

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion to resolve charges of illegal and fraudulent promotion of its products:
The largest health care fraud settlement in Department of Justice history;
The largest criminal fine of any kind imposed in the U.S.;
The largest ever civil fraud settlement against a pharmaceutical company.
The case was also a massive investigation on the part of the FBI and our law enforcement colleagues, involving countless hours of work over a period of more than four years


Pfizer “intended to circumvent specific FDA indications concerning their drugs by using its sales force to aggressively promote off-label uses,” Perkins said. “We have interviewed numerous physicians, sales representatives, and managers who have corroborated these assertions.”
Indeed, it was company employees who blew the whistle about off-label marketing—and kickbacks to physicians, who were paid to prescribe certain drugs.



Let us hope physicians today are not as corruptable, especially on the subject of covid, diagnosis of, and those less than honest death certificates.

The manufacturers of the Bills Vaccine Pfizer have been far from squeaky clean in past dealings.

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/ ... ent_090209

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion to resolve charges of illegal and fraudulent promotion of its products:
The largest health care fraud settlement in Department of Justice history;
The largest criminal fine of any kind imposed in the U.S.;
The largest ever civil fraud settlement against a pharmaceutical company.
The case was also a massive investigation on the part of the FBI and our law enforcement colleagues, involving countless hours of work over a period of more than four years


Pfizer “intended to circumvent specific FDA indications concerning their drugs by using its sales force to aggressively promote off-label uses,” Perkins said. “We have interviewed numerous physicians, sales representatives, and managers who have corroborated these assertions.”
Indeed, it was company employees who blew the whistle about off-label marketing—and kickbacks to physicians, who were paid to prescribe certain drugs.



Let us hope physicians today are not as corruptable, especially on the subject of covid, diagnosis of, and those less than honest death certificates.

Corruption is indeed an interesting subject and it's interesting that "your" movement has now moved down this path.

What tack are you taking now ?
Vast, vast numbers of people are corruptible, in just about every walk of life and especially those in power. After all, they can influence the direction of travel for governments around the globe and it's certainly not a new phenomenon.

In a capitalist driven society, money talks and where money is changing handle, there will always be someone looking to exploit it.

Your "movement" seems to be picking up every little "crumb" and magnifying it to promote their agenda.
Ultimately, if a supplier is exploiting its customers and is found out, there will usually be a cost and therefore its a risk that they take.

It's not earth shattering news that a company tries to push sales of more profitable items.

Thankfully in an "open" world, these issues do tend to surface and its then up to the "buyers/consumers" to take whichever action they deem fit.
It's not "right" but, this again has happened since humans began walking the planet.

Corruption is indeed an interesting subject and it's interesting that "your" movement has now moved down this path.

What tack are you taking now ?
Vast, vast numbers of people are corruptible, in just about every walk of life and especially those in power. After all, they can influence the direction of travel for governments around the globe and it's certainly not a new phenomenon.

In a capitalist driven society, money talks and where money is changing handle, there will always be someone looking to exploit it.

Your "movement" seems to be picking up every little "crumb" and magnifying it to promote their agenda.
Ultimately, if a supplier is exploiting its customers and is found out, there will usually be a cost and therefore its a risk that they take.

It's not earth shattering news that a company tries to push sales of more profitable items.

Thankfully in an "open" world, these issues do tend to surface and its then up to the "buyers/consumers" to take whichever action they deem fit.
It's not "right" but, this again has happened since humans began walking the planet.

We shall see here is the link about Shelley Tasker this exactly why you are shallow with your analysis, you jump straight in without substance to back it up.

Interesting how she is anti mask, she mentions plandemic.

https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornw ... ey-4682951

You called a number of posters out as the Terrible 2 and backing band (which you referred I was one) this was on November 13 if you have forgotten. On the same date you said words to the effect Not one single post of mine have they brought up to dissect and prove its a load of balls. Well have a look at the link above!

You raisded the word Plandemic and Wrencat returned with the assumption it was your word to try and illustrate all this was planned, well you clearly got it from the Conspiracy theorists who believe the plandemic is to inject people with tracking devices.

If and when there is a credible vaccine then its a choice.

I nearly fell of my chair laughing at this woman someone you say "Well done, this brave woman has started the turning tide and will be on the right side of history"

Again a post with no foundation!

We shall see here is the link about Shelley Tasker this exactly why you are shallow with your analysis, you jump straight in without substance to back it up.

Interesting how she is anti mask, she mentions plandemic.

https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornw ... ey-4682951

You called a number of posters out as the Terrible 2 and backing band (which you referred I was one) this was on November 13 if you have forgotten. On the same date you said words to the effect Not one single post of mine have they brought up to dissect and prove its a load of balls. Well have a look at the link above!

You raisded the word Plandemic and Wrencat returned with the assumption it was your word to try and illustrate all this was planned, well you clearly got it from the Conspiracy theorists who believe the plandemic is to inject people with tracking devices.

If and when there is a credible vaccine then its a choice.

I nearly fell of my chair laughing at this woman someone you say "Well done, this brave woman has started the turning tide and will be on the right side of history"

Again a post with no foundation!

Ok, what does your link claim.

“referenced the term 'plandemic', suggesting that coronavirus vaccines would be used to implant tracking devices in people.”

No, the term “plandemic” does not does not refer to tracking devices. Shelley does not mention “tracking device.” on your web page.
This has been made up by the author in a cheap attempt to discredit her.

Also, so what if she calls the “pandemic” a “plandemic”? I don't blame her at all.

“The 43-year-old - who has ONLY ever been an agency staff worker for Royal Cornwall Hospitals”

“ONLY.” I'm sure all the “agency staff workers” who have been on the so called “front line” during all this will be well peed off being referred to as “ONLY” No clapping in the streets or dancing on the wards for that lot then.

“During her speech she also told people that on the previous Friday there were just three people in the Covid-19 ward at RCH after taking and sharing screenshots of confidential information.
This was the correct amount of patients in the hospital with Covid-19 at the time” Your web page admits.
No lie there then.

On Thursday (November 5) the boss of Cornwall's hospitals, Kate Shields, said that on that day (November 5), there were then seven coronavirus patients in the Royal Cornwall Hospital, with three of those in intensive care

But Tasker was not referring to November the 5th, that was the day she resigned, she was refering to October 29th.

=#800000The most recent data shows four people with the virus were receiving care at the Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust on October 29, supporting Ms Tasker’s claim
https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/11/ ... s-overrun/

Tasker stated ““None of the wards were overflowing with Covid patients and they’re not now.”
And as you can see from hospital boss Kate Shields testomony on Nov 5th, seven patients with three of those in Intensive care =#800000are not wards overflowing with covid patients.
Shelley Tasker was correct then.

So what if she is anti mask? Even the WHO warned against the general public wearing masks for years until they took that particular section down from their web page when this "corona" business began. I know, because I checked at the time and went back a day or two later and it had conveniently been removed. You may be suprised but there are many many people anti-mask and I don't mean on the web.
Again, a hatchet job web page with no foundation.

You must try harder RW&B.

A few comments from your suggested page.

Conspiracy theorist!!, based on what??, she merely told the truth on what's going on inside hospitals, it's a shame more nhs workers don't have as much courage to do the right thing

All due respect, there have only been 3 deaths up till now in Cornwall since March 2020. There is no pandemic. I can vouch for her character: she only speaks the Truth

And this in support of you.

Yet another example of 'Thatcher's Children' - a pathetic, inadequate, mendacious, attention-seeking nobody who never achieved anything worthwhile in her life and will do/say anything just to get someone/anyone to notice her anonymous self. File with Incels, anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, QAnon and all the other conspiracy lunatics

Ok, what does your link claim.

“referenced the term 'plandemic', suggesting that coronavirus vaccines would be used to implant tracking devices in people.”

No, the term “plandemic” does not does not refer to tracking devices. Shelley does not mention “tracking device.” on your web page.
This has been made up by the author in a cheap attempt to discredit her.

Also, so what if she calls the “pandemic” a “plandemic”? I don't blame her at all.

“The 43-year-old - who has ONLY ever been an agency staff worker for Royal Cornwall Hospitals”

“ONLY.” I'm sure all the “agency staff workers” who have been on the so called “front line” during all this will be well peed off being referred to as “ONLY” No clapping in the streets or dancing on the wards for that lot then.

“During her speech she also told people that on the previous Friday there were just three people in the Covid-19 ward at RCH after taking and sharing screenshots of confidential information.
This was the correct amount of patients in the hospital with Covid-19 at the time” Your web page admits.
No lie there then.

On Thursday (November 5) the boss of Cornwall's hospitals, Kate Shields, said that on that day (November 5), there were then seven coronavirus patients in the Royal Cornwall Hospital, with three of those in intensive care

But Tasker was not referring to November the 5th, that was the day she resigned, she was refering to October 29th.

=#800000The most recent data shows four people with the virus were receiving care at the Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust on October 29, supporting Ms Tasker’s claim
https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/11/ ... s-overrun/

Tasker stated ““None of the wards were overflowing with Covid patients and they’re not now.”
And as you can see from hospital boss Kate Shields testomony on Nov 5th, seven patients with three of those in Intensive care =#800000are not wards overflowing with covid patients.
Shelley Tasker was correct then.

So what if she is anti mask? Even the WHO warned against the general public wearing masks for years until they took that particular section down from their web page when this "corona" business began. I know, because I checked at the time and went back a day or two later and it had conveniently been removed. You may be suprised but there are many many people anti-mask and I don't mean on the web.
Again, a hatchet job web page with no foundation.

You must try harder RW&B.

A few comments from your suggested page.

Conspiracy theorist!!, based on what??, she merely told the truth on what's going on inside hospitals, it's a shame more nhs workers don't have as much courage to do the right thing

All due respect, there have only been 3 deaths up till now in Cornwall since March 2020. There is no pandemic. I can vouch for her character: she only speaks the Truth

And this in support of you.

Yet another example of 'Thatcher's Children' - a pathetic, inadequate, mendacious, attention-seeking nobody who never achieved anything worthwhile in her life and will do/say anything just to get someone/anyone to notice her anonymous self. File with Incels, anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, QAnon and all the other conspiracy lunatics

Interesting (deceptive?) choice of language the powers that be use.

The Government said a further 168 people had died within 28 days of testing positive for Covid-19 as of today, Sunday, bringing the UK total to 51,934

But interestingly it does not say they died of covid-19. So, have the 51,934 died of covid or simply tested positive and not in fact caused by "covid.?" If they died of covid, why don't they just say so? And why not mention any other disease that may be lurking within these poor unfortunate people. Why does only "covid." get referenced?

Separate figures published by the UK’s statistics agencies for deaths where Covid-19 has been mentioned on the death certificate, together with additional data on deaths that have occurred in recent days, show there have now been 67,000 deaths involving Covid-19 in the UK

Again, language such as “mentioned” “involving”

But not "of" Why?

I now expect the cavalry to come over the hill to

me down but I believe it's a legitemate question.

https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornw ... ve-4703652

Interesting (deceptive?) choice of language the powers that be use.

The Government said a further 168 people had died within 28 days of testing positive for Covid-19 as of today, Sunday, bringing the UK total to 51,934

But interestingly it does not say they died of covid-19. So, have the 51,934 died of covid or simply tested positive and not in fact caused by "covid.?" If they died of covid, why don't they just say so? And why not mention any other disease that may be lurking within these poor unfortunate people. Why does only "covid." get referenced?

Separate figures published by the UK’s statistics agencies for deaths where Covid-19 has been mentioned on the death certificate, together with additional data on deaths that have occurred in recent days, show there have now been 67,000 deaths involving Covid-19 in the UK

Again, language such as “mentioned” “involving”

But not "of" Why?

I now expect the cavalry to come over the hill to

me down but I believe it's a legitemate question.

https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornw ... ve-4703652

Because cause of death is usually complicated. People actually only die [uof[/u one thing and that's a lack of oxygen to the brain. The reasons for this lack of oxygen are varied and often complex. It can also be a combination of factors where even if just one wasn't present, they may have survived. Cause of death is more often than not a matter of professional judgement for the doctors.
To add to your 'what about all the people who recover from Covid-19 and then get hit by a bus within 28 days?' nonsense, (covid wouldn't likely appear on the death certificate if such a case were to occur btw), if Derek Draper were to die, would he count on the stats?

https://news.yahoo.com/derek-drapers-he ... 11040.html

PS - I'm not the cavalry, I'm just on my coffee break at work, the others are probably sleeping. We'll discuss how to combat your arguments at our normal zoom meeting, scheduled for 7am GMT.

Because cause of death is usually complicated. People actually only die [uof[/u one thing and that's a lack of oxygen to the brain. The reasons for this lack of oxygen are varied and often complex. It can also be a combination of factors where even if just one wasn't present, they may have survived. Cause of death is more often than not a matter of professional judgement for the doctors.
To add to your 'what about all the people who recover from Covid-19 and then get hit by a bus within 28 days?' nonsense, (covid wouldn't likely appear on the death certificate if such a case were to occur btw), if Derek Draper were to die, would he count on the stats?

https://news.yahoo.com/derek-drapers-he ... 11040.html

PS - I'm not the cavalry, I'm just on my coffee break at work, the others are probably sleeping. We'll discuss how to combat your arguments at our normal zoom meeting, scheduled for 7am GMT.

Sorry Miro

You just don't get it do you you post links that are basically rubbish she was a bank worker who did one shift she is a conspiracy theorist. Of course all the links you post are great when they get analysed you come out with more rubbish to defend them.

Perhaps you should stop posting until your post has some foundation to it.

Looks to me like you are in a different vortex

Sorry Miro

You just don't get it do you you post links that are basically rubbish she was a bank worker who did one shift she is a conspiracy theorist. Of course all the links you post are great when they get analysed you come out with more rubbish to defend them.

Perhaps you should stop posting until your post has some foundation to it.

Looks to me like you are in a different vortex

Thank you so much. Hot on the heels of your pal wrencat finaly admiting the corruption that abounds arround this "covid" you now admit that they don't know if these "covid" victims were in fact covid victims. Just what we have been arguing all along.

Yet for months we have been inundated with death figures from covid-19.
Here is another propaganda headline from the BBC just today.

[size=150Covid: How the UK reached 50,000 virus deaths
The deaths have come in waves
The majority of the deaths came in the spring as the virus took the UK by surprise. [/size
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54908177

By suprise? More BBC bullcrap and dare I say it? Fake news ?

And what's this?
=#800000To add to your 'what about all the people who recover from Covid-19 and then get hit by a bus within 28 days?' nonsense,

I never stated that? Where did you get that from?
You lot don't need zoom, just gorge yourself on main stream media propaganda and re gurgitate on here.

Thank you so much. Hot on the heels of your pal wrencat finaly admiting the corruption that abounds arround this "covid" you now admit that they don't know if these "covid" victims were in fact covid victims. Just what we have been arguing all along.

Yet for months we have been inundated with death figures from covid-19.
Here is another propaganda headline from the BBC just today.

[size=150Covid: How the UK reached 50,000 virus deaths
The deaths have come in waves
The majority of the deaths came in the spring as the virus took the UK by surprise. [/size
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54908177

By suprise? More BBC bullcrap and dare I say it? Fake news ?

And what's this?
=#800000To add to your 'what about all the people who recover from Covid-19 and then get hit by a bus within 28 days?' nonsense,

I never stated that? Where did you get that from?
You lot don't need zoom, just gorge yourself on main stream media propaganda and re gurgitate on here.

IRONY OVERLOAD !!!

The only gorging on propaganda and fake news if from yourself.

You have given me a chuckle this morning though.
Apparently the Tories are having a "re set" - maybe your prophecy has started







Is it your prophecy or, are you just being a good citizen by helping keep the world informed ?

IRONY OVERLOAD !!!

The only gorging on propaganda and fake news if from yourself.

You have given me a chuckle this morning though.
Apparently the Tories are having a "re set" - maybe your prophecy has started







Is it your prophecy or, are you just being a good citizen by helping keep the world informed ?

Yes, at this stage in my opinion I wouldn't rule it out.

The anthrax case reemerged in 2011 following a lawsuit in relation to the first victim. A huge payout of $2.5 million was made to the family of Robert Stevens killed by anthrax.

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/a ... ement.html

Interesting takeways from the article:-

The accused perpetrator of the attacks did an "[uEpstein[/u" - [iDr. Ivins killed himself in 2008 as prosecutors prepared to indict him in the attacks,[/i"

Don't you find it a tad bit suspicious that they always end up dead?

Conclusion of the law suit:-

[i"In a July filing in the civil case, Justice Department lawyers said Dr. Ivins “[udid not have the specialized equipment[/u” in his lab to make the dry anthrax powder in the letters — appearing to contradict the department’s claims in the criminal case. Days later, the lawyers retracted the statement."[/i and then of course they got the substantial hush money!

Nothing adds up with anthrax just like the C19 narrative.

I'm also beginning to see similarities with the anthrax attack being used as a cover to press forward in passing the Patriot Act to how George Floyd's death could be used in the long run to help bring about "unconscious biased" AI policing fed off mass surveillance data. There was certainly more to that George Floyd story than the virtue signalling from the mainstream media would let you know.

Here's a company that would need to be kept an eye on for pushing the AI tech agenda.

https://carbyne911.com/

Nice to see all the usual "Partners" are affiliated to them. And its 'Meet our Team' page also shows they've got the personnel to implement the plan. All for the mega rich to benefit at the expense of our rights.

Yes, at this stage in my opinion I wouldn't rule it out.

The anthrax case reemerged in 2011 following a lawsuit in relation to the first victim. A huge payout of $2.5 million was made to the family of Robert Stevens killed by anthrax.

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/a ... ement.html

Interesting takeways from the article:-

The accused perpetrator of the attacks did an "[uEpstein[/u" - [iDr. Ivins killed himself in 2008 as prosecutors prepared to indict him in the attacks,[/i"

Don't you find it a tad bit suspicious that they always end up dead?

Conclusion of the law suit:-

[i"In a July filing in the civil case, Justice Department lawyers said Dr. Ivins “[udid not have the specialized equipment[/u” in his lab to make the dry anthrax powder in the letters — appearing to contradict the department’s claims in the criminal case. Days later, the lawyers retracted the statement."[/i and then of course they got the substantial hush money!

Nothing adds up with anthrax just like the C19 narrative.

I'm also beginning to see similarities with the anthrax attack being used as a cover to press forward in passing the Patriot Act to how George Floyd's death could be used in the long run to help bring about "unconscious biased" AI policing fed off mass surveillance data. There was certainly more to that George Floyd story than the virtue signalling from the mainstream media would let you know.

Here's a company that would need to be kept an eye on for pushing the AI tech agenda.

https://carbyne911.com/

Nice to see all the usual "Partners" are affiliated to them. And its 'Meet our Team' page also shows they've got the personnel to implement the plan. All for the mega rich to benefit at the expense of our rights.