I'm not comparing Westwood with Oloughlin's. But if I was I agree Westwood's was worse. My point is that O'Loughlin and Wigan have got off once again with a ridiculously light verdict. Flower should've gotten more than 10 games, O'Loughlin should've gotten more.

This is just another debacle that makes this sport a laughing stock.

[list=[/list

Not really, I think its about right. As I said, a lazy arm that was clumsy. I wouldnt put it down as violent conduct.

Lets be honest, if this wasnt Wigan's captain in the dock, there wouldnt be half the uproar that there has been.

Stay classy.

Thats a really disappointing comment Willzay.

You want to be honest, OK then what if it had been Tomkins instead of Annakin, would you still feel the same?

I'm not playing your game, mate. Why don't you tell me who you think the big teams are?

Then we'll have a sensible discourse.

I could think of something more classy to say to you, but it would probably get me banned for life.

Yes. Having played the game there is a difference between a lazy arm and violent intent. In my opinion, it was a clumsy, lazy challenge worthy of his red card and 1 match ban.

Go home Mr Wane you are an embaressment to RL.

A what?

A poor attempt at being funny when you just edited your incorrect spelling of 'disappointing' on a previous post. Jog on.

Ok....Wigan,saints,wire ,hull ,leeds

Yeah you got me there.....


Anyway, back on topic, the injury suffered probably isnt taken into consideration by the panel as it COULD happen in any tackle, be it legal or illegal, it was the way he fell, lets say the tackle was shoulder height, he could have potentially fallen the exact same way to the ground.

I would say trying to avoid being hit

I'm sure you've played the game with a sidestep like that, that's not what I asked you. Only O'loughlin will know how much intent there was, what I asked you was would you be treating this as trivial as you are if it had been ginger Tomkins what had been on the receiving end.

I can't wait for FC to beat this sanctimonious shower in the semi. I hope it's a last minute dodgy penalty awarded by Child against the run of play #inanykindofweather

Wigan Athletic have the facilities that you use, we doesn't come into really does it as you own jack , yes your a richer club,, yes you have a bigger fan base of course its going to turn the youth heads that way, seen you waste talent with imports over the years

Ginger??

I answered your question. I said yes. And no, I dont believe it was violent.

Wrong. Our facilities are at Orrell, which we bought, and own. We only use the DW on match days

Wigan Athletic now train at a complex in Bolton.

Unlucky.

'"

[*:3sbcif7k

[url:3sbcif7khttp://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/wakefield-trinity/exclusive-angry-wakefield-trinity-coach-chris-chester-brands-rfl-disciplinary-system-a-joke-1-8012895[/url

Cheers. Seen that, read my post.

Wigan, Leeds and Stains I agree with, the other two don't have the "pedigree" to be considered big clubs imo.

yes you have to train else where because athletic don't even allow to warm up before the game in front of the post, I thought Orrell had gone well well so you own a hole

TBF, Orrell's probably about the same standard stadium as Belle Vue too.

You know nothing. The gym and facilities at Orrell are amoungst the best in the country. The club spent over a million pounds on it.

Your not very good at this are you.