And Annakin as well. Webster whines about injuries and sends two fit players out on loan. They might've been not as fit as other players but playing SL would do them better.

Haven't heard Webster whine!

He does say Annakin needs game time to be match fit...so fair enough, with not having a reserve grade to bring him back through.

Or should we play unfit players and risk further injuries?

It's not Sammut's position we are struggling in.

Really ?, it seems to me that we are trying everyone at stand off apart from the one natural stand off that we have.

Agreed.
Webster obviously has a problem with Sammut although selling him to Bradford may just cost us later in the year.
Finally, for a club that is not blessed with cash, it seems crazy to be paying someone who we are not prepared to play, it's just odd.

Think we need another forward to replace Sammut who is stealing a wage sat on the touch line. Let Bradford have him back and get a front row forward who runs through onto the ball with pace and tackles hard. They've got about 8 props now.

I was meaning in terms of injury rather than form.

Regardless, whatever Sammut is doing in training is not enough.

How half hearted must he be, to get in a team as poor as Wakey.

Personally, I'd like him to play...in friendlies he looked great...but, something is not right with him.

Well, I'm sorry but if you're the coach of Wakefield Trinity you do not have the luxury of sulking if it means a talented player has to sit it out!

We do not have the resources and simply cannot afford for our head coach to refuse point blank to pick a player because they don't get on!

If he's fit and available he should be played!

I understand it's more a case of a sulking player, rather than a sulking coach.

If as a coach, I thought a player would improve my chances of a win, I'd pick him.

I thought his defence was not up to the team's standards. I guess that could mean if he played he might show the rest up because I doubt it can be worse than we have currently.

He'd have to be scoring 'own try's' similar to own goals in football!

It's actually not possible in RL but to be worse than what we're currently getting he'd have to find a way to do it!

Sammut won't be at Bradford this season, they are full up on their cap and would have to shift two or three good players to be able to accommodate him

Well I'm not as informed as you appear to be re our salary cap but if we needed to shift 2/3 good players to sign him then I wouldn't bother personally. I like Sammut but I wouldn't be paying him silly money, just how big a contract did you offer him?

If Webster won't play him, but you cannot afford to sign anyone while he remains it doesn't leave Wakefield in a strong negotiating position. He'd be a useful addition for Bradford but with Mullaney back, we aren't desperate for a 6/7 at this moment.

Quote ="Tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/

Quote ="Tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/

Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'"

Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'"

Quote ="tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'" Oh dear yet another blinding revelation from our friendly WTW correspondent from across the common

Quote ="tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'" Oh dear yet another blinding revelation from our friendly WTW correspondent from across the common

Yep, he even sent me a PM with some potentially libelous and obviously made up rubbish as
to why he wouldn't ever play for London again.
Complete troll.

Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'" Is that 'our' Chris Annakin who is listed as Dual reg?????

Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'" Is that 'our' Chris Annakin who is listed as Dual reg?????

Yes.

Does Annakin have more to offer than some of the players who played last night????

Or is he getting back to match fitness???

Hopefully the latter.

Let him go as if Webster not going to play. Why. Pay him to sit on bench

Easier said than done. Whoever takes him either need a significant amount of cap space available or will need to rely on a hefty pay out from WTW which will not happen in my opinion. Keeping him and dual regging him with London means some of his wages are paid by the London club and should we get any more injuries we can still call upon him though admittedly this really does look like we'd be doing this as a last resort.

Does anyone know if Sammut going back to Bradford is to be announced tomorrow

No it's not. It's a signing from another championship club

Care to elaborate?