|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 1474 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2020 | 5 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="FIL"Yep, the final one was changed about 6-8 weeks ago
 '"
I bet you were driving past FIL when it went up? |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4593 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="Dunkirk Spirit"I’m sure that floodlights pylon in the background is the new one, I don’t remember seeing it in position when I looked at the ground during this Tuesday Christmas lunch.
Small steps still continues.
https://twitter.com/WTrinityRL/status/1 ... 37/photo/1
 '"
All 4 floidlights in place now, |
|
Quote ="Dunkirk Spirit"I’m sure that floodlights pylon in the background is the new one, I don’t remember seeing it in position when I looked at the ground during this Tuesday Christmas lunch.
Small steps still continues.
https://twitter.com/WTrinityRL/status/1 ... 37/photo/1
'"
All 4 floidlights in place now, | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 2785 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2019 | 6 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Consultation letter from WMDC to SOS
Planning Casework Unit
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
1st Floor
Coburg House
Mayflower Street
Plymouth
PL1 1DJ
0303 444 8041
pcu@communities.gov.uk
Our ref: 20/02249/FUL
Date: 22 December 2021 Dear Sir or Madam
Service Director, Planning and Transportation: Bronwen Knight Wakefield One
PO Box 700
Burton Street Wakefield
WF1 2EB
Typetalk calls welcome
CONSULTATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE UNDER THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONSULTATION) (ENGLAND) DIRECTION 2021 IN RESPECT OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING PLANNING APPLICATION FOR GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT:
Application Ref: 20/02249/FUL
Applicant: Newmarket Lane Ltd
Description: Full planning application for the development of two storage and distribution warehouses (19,105 sq. m and 18,260 sq m.) (Use Class Bicon_cool.gif together with ancillary offices, lorry and car parking, hard-standing, yard, drainage, landscaping and associated infrastructure and engineering works and a new pedestrian and cycle route from the B6135 to the Trans Pennine Trail.
Site: Plot 8 Land South Of Newmarket Lane, Stanley, Wakefield, WF3 4BU
This letter represents a formal consultation with the Secretary of State as required by paragraph 10 of the Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2021. Please acknowledge receipt of this consultation and confirm the dates on which the 21 day consultation period will begin and end (if the conclusion of the consultation is that the Secretary of State does not wish to intervene).
The proposal is Green Belt Development, as defined by the Direction, as it is for inappropriate development within the Green Belt which consists of the provision of a building where the floorspace created by the development is more than 1,000m2. The application is also an EIA application, as defined by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
Regulations 2017.
Wakefield Metropolitan District’s Council’s Planning and Highways Committee resolved to approve the application at the Committee Meeting of 16 December 2021 for the reasons and subject to the planning conditions and obligations set out in the attached Committee Report.
Details of the Committee Meeting are included on the Council’s Website at:
mg.wakefield.gov.uk/ieListDocume ... 4965&Ver=4
The Committee Report sets out both the Council’s reasoned conclusion on the potential significant effects of the development upon the environment (concluding that the development would be environmentally acceptable) and the reasons why the Council considers that Very Special Circumstances exist warranting a departure from the Development Plan.
Full details of the application including application form, requisite notice, submitted plans, consultation responses, representations, environmental statement and further environmental information are available on the Council’s Public Access for Planning website via the following link:
https://planning.wakefield.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QIGDSJQQIO200&activeTab=summary
Please also find attached for ease of reference a copy of the Committee Report, which explains the material considerations which the authority consider indicate a departure application should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the development plan, together with the submitted location plan, site plan and elevations drawing.
I hope that the above is sufficient in order for you to respond to this consultation; however if you
require any further information, please do not hesitate to ask.
Yours sincerely
Michael Eaglestone
Major Projects Officer
Development Management
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Tel: 01924 303396/ 07795 497761
Email: meaglestone@wakefield.gov.uk |
|
Consultation letter from WMDC to SOS
Planning Casework Unit
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
1st Floor
Coburg House
Mayflower Street
Plymouth
PL1 1DJ
0303 444 8041
pcu@communities.gov.uk
Our ref: 20/02249/FUL
Date: 22 December 2021 Dear Sir or Madam
Service Director, Planning and Transportation: Bronwen Knight Wakefield One
PO Box 700
Burton Street Wakefield
WF1 2EB
Typetalk calls welcome
CONSULTATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE UNDER THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONSULTATION) (ENGLAND) DIRECTION 2021 IN RESPECT OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING PLANNING APPLICATION FOR GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT:
Application Ref: 20/02249/FUL
Applicant: Newmarket Lane Ltd
Description: Full planning application for the development of two storage and distribution warehouses (19,105 sq. m and 18,260 sq m.) (Use Class Bicon_cool.gif together with ancillary offices, lorry and car parking, hard-standing, yard, drainage, landscaping and associated infrastructure and engineering works and a new pedestrian and cycle route from the B6135 to the Trans Pennine Trail.
Site: Plot 8 Land South Of Newmarket Lane, Stanley, Wakefield, WF3 4BU
This letter represents a formal consultation with the Secretary of State as required by paragraph 10 of the Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2021. Please acknowledge receipt of this consultation and confirm the dates on which the 21 day consultation period will begin and end (if the conclusion of the consultation is that the Secretary of State does not wish to intervene).
The proposal is Green Belt Development, as defined by the Direction, as it is for inappropriate development within the Green Belt which consists of the provision of a building where the floorspace created by the development is more than 1,000m2. The application is also an EIA application, as defined by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)
Regulations 2017.
Wakefield Metropolitan District’s Council’s Planning and Highways Committee resolved to approve the application at the Committee Meeting of 16 December 2021 for the reasons and subject to the planning conditions and obligations set out in the attached Committee Report.
Details of the Committee Meeting are included on the Council’s Website at:
mg.wakefield.gov.uk/ieListDocume ... 4965&Ver=4
The Committee Report sets out both the Council’s reasoned conclusion on the potential significant effects of the development upon the environment (concluding that the development would be environmentally acceptable) and the reasons why the Council considers that Very Special Circumstances exist warranting a departure from the Development Plan.
Full details of the application including application form, requisite notice, submitted plans, consultation responses, representations, environmental statement and further environmental information are available on the Council’s Public Access for Planning website via the following link:
https://planning.wakefield.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QIGDSJQQIO200&activeTab=summary
Please also find attached for ease of reference a copy of the Committee Report, which explains the material considerations which the authority consider indicate a departure application should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the development plan, together with the submitted location plan, site plan and elevations drawing.
I hope that the above is sufficient in order for you to respond to this consultation; however if you
require any further information, please do not hesitate to ask.
Yours sincerely
Michael Eaglestone
Major Projects Officer
Development Management
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Tel: 01924 303396/ 07795 497761
Email: meaglestone@wakefield.gov.uk | |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4593 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Thanks for update Dunkirk
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4804 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
By my reckoning tomorrow is the 21st day since planning permission was granted which should mean that the S.O.S has no more time to "call it in" for a public enquiry so, assuming my calculations are correct, what happens next and when ??
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 36144 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="FIL"By my reckoning tomorrow is the 21st day since planning permission was granted which should mean that the S.O.S has no more time to "call it in" for a public enquiry so, assuming my calculations are correct, what happens next and when ??'"
Have you included the holiday period in that? |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4804 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Nope, just 21 actual days, public officials don't get holidays do they ??  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 2785 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2019 | 6 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="FIL"By my reckoning tomorrow is the 21st day since planning permission was granted which should mean that the S.O.S has no more time to "call it in" for a public enquiry so, assuming my calculations are correct, what happens next and when ??'"
It’s a bit confusing to me, the paragraph below is asking when the consultation period begins and ends, if the SoS does Not wish to intervene. My understanding was there’s a six week period for the SoS to intervene should he/she wish to do so.
Anyone on here got a better understanding of these things, please let us know, thanks.
Please acknowledge receipt of this consultation and confirm the dates on which the 21 day consultation period will begin and end (if the conclusion of the consultation is that the Secretary of State does not wish to intervene |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 869 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Oct 2022 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Am I right in thinking the plan is to demolish the East stand after the Cas game at Easter?
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4246 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Wildcat26"Am I right in thinking the plan is to demolish the East stand after the Cas game at Easter?'"
Yes. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 2785 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2019 | 6 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Wildcat26"Am I right in thinking the plan is to demolish the East stand after the Cas game at Easter?'"
That will depend on payment of £8.3 million by the plot 8 developers some time before April. Although I’m quietly confident of that happening, I don’t think MC and JM jump in before the last T. Is crossed. |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4804 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Isn't it £8.8 million ??
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 2785 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2019 | 6 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="FIL"Isn't it £8.8 million ??'"
The first line says different, but I hope you are right
11.7 The financial contribution demonstrated by the viability appraisal to be affordable of £8.3m is sufficient to fund the works at Belle Vue proposed to be undertaken by Newmarket Lane Limited (the works are subject to a planning application which is being concurrently with this application). and hence capable of delivering the financial contribution to the works cost. Newmarket Lane Limited will let the contract for those works and will be the employer under that contract. It is envisaged that the contract will be let in late 2021 with a 12 month construction period. Newmarket Lane Limited and its contractor will be granted a licence by Spirit of 1873 Limited to enter onto the ground at Belle Vue for the purposes of carrying out those works. The Spirit of 1873 Limited will fund and appoint the contractor for carrying out the works that it has identified as carrying out. Between Newmarket Lane Limited and the Spirit of 1873 Limited, the entire works package will be delivered. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 2785 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2019 | 6 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Dunkirk Spirit"The first line says different, but I hope you are right
11.7 The financial contribution demonstrated by the viability appraisal to be affordable of £8.3m is sufficient to fund the works at Belle Vue proposed to be undertaken by Newmarket Lane Limited (the works are subject to a planning application which is being concurrently with this application). and hence capable of delivering the financial contribution to the works cost. Newmarket Lane Limited will let the contract for those works and will be the employer under that contract. It is envisaged that the contract will be let in late 2021 with a 12 month construction period. Newmarket Lane Limited and its contractor will be granted a licence by Spirit of 1873 Limited to enter onto the ground at Belle Vue for the purposes of carrying out those works. The Spirit of 1873 Limited will fund and appoint the contractor for carrying out the works that it has identified as carrying out. Between Newmarket Lane Limited and the Spirit of 1873 Limited, the entire works package will be delivered.'"
You are probably correct FIL, regarding the £8.8 million, I’ve just found this section from the
PLANNING AND HIGHWAYS COMMITTEE Thursday, 16 December 2021 AGENDA
The applicant for planning application ref. 20/02249/FUL proposes to make an £8.8 million contribution towards the delivery of the stadium improvement works which are the subject of this report. The applicant argues that this contribution, in combination with a £2m allocation from the WMDC Sports Resilience Fund, would facilitate the delivery of the stadium improvement works (which Spirit of 1873 estimate will cost £10.8m). The applicant argues that the stadium improvement works would result in significant public benefits associated with providing suitable standard accommodation for Wakefield Trinity R.L.F.C and the utilisation of the enhanced facilities by community groups. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4804 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| There's an interview with JM in today's League Express and he states that the funding should be formalised this month by way of the 106 agreement and he is confident that demolition work on the East Stand will start by mid-April and the work on the North Terrace will start after the season ends. He is as confident as can be that things are on course.  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 5282 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2014 | 11 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Does anyone know where they intend to put the temporary seating once they start demolishing the East Stand.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4246 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Certainly on the West terrace, but was also told they are considering in front of "the flats".
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 5282 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2014 | 11 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
The lower balcony certainly limits the height plus the possibility of things falling from the bar and boxes above. It will be an interesting conundrum considering the age of of many who currently frequent the east stand seats.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4804 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| They would have a cracking view from on top of the Benidorm flats  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Fringe Player | 12 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2021 | 3 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2022 | May 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
I assume the temporary seating will have a roof.
Would it be possible to leave it there for a season or three?
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 7179 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Georgieboy"I assume the temporary seating will have a roof.
Would it be possible to leave it there for a season or three?'"
I wonder if temporary seating will be hired in or bought. If it is bought then I wonder if there’s been consideration for it to be relocated to the south stand in front of the flats after east stand is complete.
Would probably only be able to get a few rows in there for a few hundred. Not sure it would be viable from a safety perspective though with balconies being above. Perhaps risks such as falling items would have to be mitigated etc.
Sorry didn’t read your post till after Scarlet!. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 36144 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Trojan Horse"I wonder if temporary seating will be hired in or bought. If it is bought then I wonder if there’s been consideration for it to be relocated to the south stand in front of the flats after east stand is complete.
Would probably only be able to get a few rows in there for a few hundred. Not sure it would be viable from a safety perspective though with balconies being above. Perhaps risks such as falling items would have to be mitigated etc.
Sorry didn’t read your post till after Scarlet!.'"
It’s always the reason I’ve been given regarding seating in front of the flats, it is just not allowed. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 7179 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="vastman"It’s always the reason I’ve been given regarding seating in front of the flats, it is just not allowed.'"
That makes sense. If they are bought then it’s a shame if we can’t find a way to utilise them. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4246 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="vastman"It’s always the reason I’ve been given regarding seating in front of the flats, it is just not allowed.'"
That's what I always understood the case to be also.
But apparently not... |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 7179 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="dboy"That's what I always understood the case to be also.
But apparently not...'"
You could eliminate the risk by having a barrier above the seating below (roof).
With the height of the first balcony though you would be severely restricted unless first balcony outside access was closed allowing higher roof placement and more seating.
I’m sure the club or developer will risk assess a number of areas and conduct viability studies for the options. |
|
|
|
|
|
'"
'"
