Not really Khlav, he had almost 2 years left on his Wigan deal, if he was good enough for them then he's good enough for anyone!

I wonder if Hull will need to release anyone to fit Gleeson in. Wouldn't mind Whiting but I suppose a few clubs would be after him too.

[url=http://www.hullfc.com/newsarticle.aspx?n=17028Bang on the mark tonight.[/url

hope we made him an offer too. At least it would show we have intentions to take the club further on the field as well as off the field.

signed extended deal im afraid, FC through and through.not going anywhere.

So they get rid of Tansey because they are tough on off-field discipline and then reunite Long and Gleeson.

This should be fun.

Exactly what I thought, they shipped a discipline case out and ship another straight back in.

In the end someone is going to get a Raw deal from this scenario. It's just a matter of if someone takes there bat and ball home with regards to FC and decides to move on. We can only wait and see what transpires.

Tansey had more than one warning and PERSISTENTLY broke club disciplinary rules, hence why he as asked to leave.

Light the blue paper and stand well back

Whereas Wigan got rid of Gleeson after just one slight misdemeanour?????????????

Don't kid yourself that he is any better than Tansey. The only hope is that he realises that he might not get many more chances. This is not sour grapes by the way I would be saying the same if we had signed him.

I can't see this ending well - Gleeson and Long together again is bad medicine for Hull.

I hope it works out for him though - he's a talented player and it wouldn't be nice to see his career end ignominiously.