Why, was it Cooke who immaced King's head?

Not that i know of

who did Als then



Sorry Al, i'll get you a pint at the next game

Latu?

Korki has allways been good for us. HEs been excellent since he come on loan. YOu were 1 of the doubters but as I remember I made a post titled korki a shrewd signing for KEar and once again Vastman I was correct. I cannot see a place for Cooke I agree with Al we havent seen his class for 3 years Morgan is a good coach and seems a nice guy obviously Cooke is a bad egg. Kear can't keep being a council worker and turning these bad eggs around.

Kear is nothing like a council worker he gets the job done right and first time!

Quality JT I like it

If we can get him on loan then we should, definitely got the skills to pay the bills and if he can't be

ed then we can just send him packing. Well worth a punt IMO - wouldn't support buying him tho

I know exactly what went on from somebody at the club but for obvious reasons I will not be allowed to put what went on. Suufice to say HKR have processes in place that all players are subject to at trainaand he did not want to and avoidided doing one of the processes.

Honest to god you couldn't make NGBC up, even if you wanted to and I don't.

The words "I" meaning you and "correct" do not belong in the same sentence - also are you Outwood Vics love child? I detect certain family traits.

You're right about one thing, I didn't rate Korki because IMO he was apart from the odd moment a poor player in his first stint with us. However when I heard Kear wanted him I was willing to give him every chance and forget all previous notions of the player - this is where you and me really differ in a big way. Luckily Korki made his mark straight away so no chances were needed in the end.

I'm sure the same will happen with King and Johnson and if it happens Cook. I only wish I had your crystal ball, I am not worthy

I dont see a problem with Cooke...

strikes me as a very similar signing to that of Bill Ashurt back in the 1970's

TBH If you had given me a choice between Cooke and Newton before the season started... I would have gone for Cooke!

between the two yes Cooke would of been the better choice, but I wouldn't of put Cooke in the same bracket as Bill Ashurst

end of the day if Cooke comes he comes and the only reason he does is because Kear believes he will offer the team something that will improve us as a side, as stated earlier he is out od contract come the end of the season so he will be wanting to prove himself it could work out better for us. if he comes and he's crap then he dont play end of. Kear as made signings which have really confused me but yet they have worked so why question him now?


















oh and one last thing
i dont comment much but ngb4c you are the most annoying =#BF0040EDIT - TRB on here go back to your dirty dark corner and count all your monopoly money you make!



to anyone else i apologise if im out of order

You ca have him, disruption must be his middle name and he never shows any sort of consistant form which is the saddest thing about a player with obvious talent

Are you Justin???

Must admit his days do look a little numbered at Rovers but they have done before this and he's always stayed on. Is this rumour just putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5 or do people think there is any substance to it?? I came up with the idea when Newton was sacked and Clinton was unveiled just out of pure guess work and rumours re Rovers cap space. Suppose it'll be a case of watch this space

Would you like to justify that statement? I'd be interested to know which traits I share with NGB4C???

Nope

Could this be a cunning plan by JK, by bringin all DB friends in he just might sign on the dotted line for another 3 years ?

Thought so.

Will he make his debut this friday after this mornings outcome?

Cooke?

Sounds like Trinity are struggling for bodies so if he has signed then chances are high.

my source in east hull tells me that we get cooke on loan until end of season (morgan had enough of him). next year he signs for us and Brough goes in opposite direction.