Very well written post...

You have provided no real evidence either, Slugger. The jury would be told to disregard your spurious "evidence" before it got that far.

You seem well versed in what goes on at a disciplinary meeting, or showing extreme arrogance towards a coach who has more experience than yourself on these matters?
CC was the coach at HKR when Boudebza got his ban upgraded from 2 to 4, through medical reports after the incident.
Now the full extent of Annakins injury layoff is clear, it would be unfair for O'Loughlin not to face retrospective punishment, wouldn't it?

Boudebza attacked the to-be-injured knee, O'Loughlin made contact with the shoulder/neck region, not the affected knee - it is simply not attributable.

Wouldn't quite call it 'attacked', he was effecting the tackle by stopping the players go forward, in what was a 'legitimate' tackle.
Whereas O'Loughlins 'illegal' tackle was a major contributor in what happened afterwards.
What's done is done but it seems that only 'Gareth', '21-12' and yourself can't or won't see the injustice that has happened.

It's funny how the most vociferous anti-Lockers drivel comes from the mother of those most affected. It's a little one-eyed.

As soon as someone shows me proof of O'Loughlin being responsible for the knee injury I'll concede.

Maybe if 'Lockers' hadn't been a mile offside, wrong footed and leaving a big gap in the defence, none of this would have happened?

He wasn't offside.

You are a complete and utter tool...

No more questions m'lord, the defendant is obviously not in a fit state of mind to carry on!

Suzy seems to spend all his/her time on here. Please go back on the Wigan site and bore them with your ramblings. Getting very bored now.

Watching tonight's game, the most ridiculous thing that is going to happen, is that Charnley will probably get between 2-4 matches for touching Robert Hicks arm in disputing a penalty to Leeds!

I doubt if he will get anything

Well, if nothing happens, the RFL are making another rod for their own backs.

He didn't grab Hicks' arm, he was just adjusting his sleeve as he thought it was a wardrobe malfunction.

Or comparing tats?

All evidence is a matter of weight. Given that you have produced none, the scales swing just one way.

Tautai's cannonball tackle was a shocker.

Aye and later on he came in 3rd man on a stationary Cutbetson I think it was and attacked the standing legs, that could have ended in injury. Ref just warned him while he was getting back into line. Lately we've seen those put on report. Not that dissimilar to Chase on Ferres last year, where Chase got 7 games, difference was Ferres got seriously hurt.

No doubt the disciplinary panel will review it and then ask Sculthorpe and Fielden to decide whether he should be banned for the semi final.

Nowt wrong with it. Not even a penalty.

Rod Studd keeps using a phrase on Twitter that "what you allow will continue", and it is probably harder to assess Wigan's physicality (I use that phrase charitably) when that's all you see. Good fortune stopped a leg-break there.

I'm sure Wane enjoyed it though.

One thing I can say about this debate is that last night was one of the very few occasions I cheered for Leeds, and all in all it made for a very good Friday night. So thank you.

Yep must admit, I didn't seem too disgusting to be shouting Leeds on last night!
But don't forget Slugger, Eddie managed to get in that Wigan had 9 players out! Zzzzz

And that Williams should be man if the match, should the MRP also cite Charney for grabbing the ref?