Bit more here.

[urlhttp://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/11/06/09/RUGBYL_Wakefield.html&BID=480[/url

Seems that Barnsley is still an option with an agreement signed that can still be taken up.
Does this mean that the rumour that the RFL didn't want us moving out of Wakey is true,hence why BV is being renovated?

Temporary stands now adorn many stadia across many sports www.arenaseating.com/cm/docs/pro ... stands.pdf

Temporary stands now adorn many stadia across many sports www.arenaseating.com/cm/docs/pro ... stands.pdf

Not all planning permission requests have to go to the committee, in fact most don't! Most are dealt with what they call delegated powers, powers that planners legally have to approve planning applications if certain conditions are met. Otherwise the planning committee would have to sit at least one day a week... which they can't! I think that this will be looking at dealing with this under delegated powers, but if not possible, it will breeze through the committee, there is nothing that is going to effect anyone or anything in any way at all.

Dont get this? I thought BV was due to be ripped down at the end of the season regardless as the planners that owned it wanted to build and the ground was condemmed due to a lack of safety certificate (as was the case with KR) - Seems a bit strange to me that your now stopping?

Is this not the case in this instance?:

"If a temporary structure or building will be in use for longer than 28 days, then according to the law, you should apply for planning permission"

You thought wrong. And if it didn't have a safety certificate we wouldn't be able to play in it now!

Yes of course! How silly of everyone else involved to forget that it's been condemned and is due to be ripped down at the end of the season.

Thanks for reminding us - back to the drawing board chaps!

I thought that was the case - is it not? I thought you playing out of there in 2012 was not an option as the developers who own the ground wanted you out and you werent able to get a further safety certificate?



Is this wakey paying lip service to the licencing criteria though - errect a temporary stand for 28 days, get the licencing re-stampped, then apply for retrospective planning. If it has to come down wakey then wont be bothered because their licence is stamped for another 3 years and you will just continue to play out of a ground that is not SL standard. IMHO if your serious about wanting to remain in SL you need to pull your finger out and get your new ground sorted and accept a year at barnsley as saints have done at widnes!

Well that's easy for you to say, but I don't think the north terrace vole and bat colonies will see it quite the same way!

When you don't know what you're talking about its common practice to shut the proverbial up!

If you want the answers to your questions get trawling the board. They are all on here somewhere, enjoy.

Oh, sorry, I forgot about them... and what about the Unicorns!

Thats why i was asking the question - as I have obviously missed something - The last I heard you couldnt remain in BV beyond the end of the season but now your re-developing? Just cant understand it or how it is ever going to work?

Dig up that terrace and there's no telling what you might find underneath. Celtic remains, the Ark of the Covenant, otter droppings....

You're months behind; if you really want to know, the truth is out there - I certainly don't intend to sum up three months in the life of WTW, simply because you can't be ar5ed to read it for yourself.

..........John Pearman........?

The rest of the money we are owed from the sale of the ground?

FFS! I was asking for a one sentence answer re why you can now remain at BV in light of previous safety issues and the owners wanting you out before the end of 2011 as this has not been explained anywhere in the media to my knowledge! If you know why dont you say instead of being deliberately obtuse and expecting me to trawl through thousands of posts!

not aware of any safety issues. however without being able to see into the future we can assume that if its safe now then something would have to happen to change this.(earthquake/plane crash etc) unless you know something we dont.

re the ownership of the ground.
it seems that an agreement has been reached to allow wakefield to remain there until the new stadium is ready.

The problem is mate... you can't answer that question in one sentence, it is complex at best... well I can't answer most questions in one sentence... but that is just me!

Because I am deliberately obtuse.

1. Never heard of any safety issues, unless your Chairman selling the ground out from under you (to himself - don't ask) is considered a safety issue.

2. The property developers who were due to buy BV pulled out some time ago.

3. The new owners appear to be the Bank of Ireland; it would seem that AG either has or is in the process of, buying it from them.

HTH.

He seems a lot happier today

have got all the bathwater back now just need to find the baby before the missus realizes she's gone and all will be good again.

so your tantrum's over now then?

I have stopped being angry if that's what you mean?