Don't agree. Yes, the game was won but a good Leeds team would have put us to the sword and they didn't because they couldn't. The moment we started playing we were the better team. I don't think Leeds were in first gear they were in the same gear all game, think you are giving the opposition way too much credit there.

As for the buying, sorry but it's way too soon for that kind of signing. If we'd been flogged in four games then yes but we haven't so can you imagine what such a signing would do to team moralee?

Sorry for calling Corey Hall ,Hurst and thanks cheshirecat57 for putting me right Think I could get a job at BBC .But I do think that Hall is a great signing by W Poaching seams to know what he is looking for

Comfortable win for Leeds, job done first half, foot off the gas 2nd, just as the sensible posters here have already mentioned.

Dream on

Generally agree with what you say, but having not seen the Cats or Saints games bar the highlights I haven't seen Trinity produce the same fluent passing and attack that Leeds displayed on Thursday. Obviously as you say no one would expect two forwards to produce the goods in the centre births.

Proofs in the pudding vasty lad

After 4 or 5 pages of optimism on this thread from the Wildcats fans prior to the game about how they were gonna win


We then got this whoppa from snowie very early into the first half

Wildcats 18 Whinos 34 was the final score snowie

Why not go the whole hog Chinny and say; Wildcats18 =#FF0000Loiners 34, and be really up to date?

You’ve been crying like a spoilt child for weeks now and one win and you’re on here gloating. Says a lot about you.

Correct...and then they wonder why they are despised so much by the rest of the West Yorkshire supporters...they make by blood boil

As said could not make the St game but my son said they played well ,then a St fan came on here and said we are the first team not to take St on down the middle and we tired them out in the second half .So it must mean we threw the ball about

I think much of Leeds fluid passing had a great deal to do with a seasoned coach realising two SRs at centre was a big error. Especially when you have two smart HB’s.

I’m not sure we could have won even if we had two real centres but Leeds would have found it hard going.

I’ve seen the Saints game and our passing was better than anything Leeds managed but Saints just hung on defensively as some of their fans have testified on here.

You missed a treat tbh despite it being a loss

Just can't afford to throw any more than my current £75 to our "Friends (?)" at SKY, vasty, and currently my 4 year old great granddaughter insists that I pay for the Peppa Pig and Spongebob channels, hence no SKY sports and Superleague. From What I read on here about the SKY coverage though I'm better off sticking with Peppa. I'm just pleased That Channel 4 are now chipping in.

Do not think Wakefield are in S L as far as the Sky pundits are concerned.I got Sky but it's more for the Australian R L no it's not every body's choice ,but a least the pundits talk about what is happening in the game and do not give a biase comantry. Because Wakefield scored 18 points in the second half the Sky pundits said it was a very scrappy half .But the week before in the same conditions it was down to the weather .Been impressed by C 4 pundits so far

Agree with you re Channel 4 Legend, quite a professional job so far.

Make your blood boil? Control your emotions.

I normally agree with you Fil but if we'd won there would have been plenty from our board crowing on theirs.
I think we got off lightly.
Winners are grinners I'm afraid.

If you want proof that referees get things wrong watch the game again. When Leeming goes for the forty-twenty Tom bats it back inside. It was given as a forty-twenty but if you slow it down you'll see that TJ gets his hand to it before he lands in touch. A point picked up by the often maligned Phill Clarke.

If you want proof that referees get things wrong watch the game again. When Leeming goes for the forty-twenty Tom bats it back inside. It was given as a forty-twenty but if you slow it down you'll see that TJ gets his hand to it before he lands in touch. A point picked up by the often maligned Phill Clarke.

Sorry about the double post. Having computer problems at the mo.

There is no doubt refs make mistakes. They are only human.
As are touch judges who make the 40-20 decision in some ways.

I don't really have a problem with it. I want them to work hard to reduce it and I want them to have tech to help them but no one is perfect.

The thing is, on this occasion they had tech to help them but never considered using it.

Yeah! Noticed that myself on Super League Show last night TP. TJ was still in play when he palmed the ball back.

I stand to be corrected but I thought the ball hit the line before Tom made contact with it and the line is out isn't it ??

The ball hit the line just before Tom touched it, shown clearly by a closer analysis during the post game chit chat. Did take a frame by frame replay to confirm that the officials got the decision correct though.