I just can't my head around how we were not up for this match. If we had been focused on this match all week we would have won instead we had the it's just another match mentality and lost.

Which player was RFA refering to when he said you cant get away with throwing yourself on the floor at this level (left hand edge).but never mind Lynne could be back for the London Game.Also its not just the first team being poorly coached the 19s are just as bad .Dickens is throwing away some talented players

Watch it or scrut rot will get his wife to diss you on twitter. The other traitor was gash too. One good chip over the top but he really is the most over rated player around.

Been our player of the season for me. Aside Matt Ryan probably. Been the only two who look like they can do something at times.

How did Owen and Happy play?

Richard Owen ought to buy a season ticket for Castleford and spend his Sundays watching them from the sidelines instead of watching Wakefield from the touchline.

Richard Moore and Matty Ryan can hold their heads up; that's about your lot.

The rest were garbage, with special mentions for Scruton and Owen, neither of whom I would have paid in washers for today's efforts; the sight of Owen leaning nonchalantly on the corner flag as if he was waiting for a bus, summed it up for me.

Time for MC to do a Bernard Guasch; the current coaching regime has run its course.

Did Gilmour play? It says on bbc report at bottom he wasn't used.

To be fair I thought Walshaw went well, along with Mathers but no one other than the 4 mentioned can really hold their head up. Sammut was doing his best behind a beaten pack I suppose.

He's a rocks and diamonds kinda player - today was mostly rocks.

Harsh on Godinet - he put himself all-over the place and was first in the chase on most occasions.

After that though...

I thought Moore, Godinet and Anderson played well.
Ryan didn't have opportunity but put effort in.

Sammut had some flashes.

Kirmond tried but some poor execution today.
Walshaw came looking for the ball went it was obvious he wasn't going to get a pass.

Why did we keep attacking the right side all the time??

I take it Kirmond was playing with an injury? I don't know whether we ran at him on purpose, or he put his hand up to make the tackles, but he did the most work out of all your guys, but was slower & slower getting up after each impact.

He's been injured all season, and most of last too. I admire his attitude but he's going to do serious damage to his body all for a coach and team mates who really are not worth it. Given some players are out due to a sore toe I don't think it's unreasonable for Kirmond to have an extended break.

Obviously many things are not going well to put it mildly, but I do wish people would not 'lash out ' unreasonably.
I injured my big toe gardening and it took over two months to get right.
I could hardly walk for three weeks let alone run.

It's an observation. It's been suggested Kirmond has been having an epidural so he can play. I've no idea whether this is still the case but it highlights the difference in characters between the two. Not that I'm complaining about Lyne being out of the side mind.

Quote ="Wildthing"Disallowed Try for Mathers '" A wrong decision: https://twitter.com/RFLReferees Ah well, que sera sera.

Quote ="Wildthing"Disallowed Try for Mathers '" A wrong decision: https://twitter.com/RFLReferees Ah well, que sera sera.

Quote ="PHe"A wrong decision: https://twitter.com/RFLReferees Ah well, que sera sera.'" Sums it up really, could have made a difference for us and brought the match to a winnable end. I'm also still trying to figure out a lot of the 2nd half decisions. Whenever the ball came out of a tackle when we had possession it was a scrum. If it was when they had possession it was a penalty to them. Seems greater than the law of averages how so many were ruled in Bradford's favour.

Quote ="PHe"A wrong decision: https://twitter.com/RFLReferees Ah well, que sera sera.'" Sums it up really, could have made a difference for us and brought the match to a winnable end. I'm also still trying to figure out a lot of the 2nd half decisions. Whenever the ball came out of a tackle when we had possession it was a scrum. If it was when they had possession it was a penalty to them. Seems greater than the law of averages how so many were ruled in Bradford's favour.

You missed out the knock on at the PTB in the set leading up to your sides first score...

And Richard Moore escaping a red card despite throwing punches at our winger and subsequently receiving a grade B charge. A I don't think it was all one sided, you just weren't good enough on the day.

And the Bradford player throwing punches, who didn't get binned?

Weren't good enough on the day because we had to sell more than half our team to stop us going into Admin, if we had last seasons team we'd be no where near the relegation zone .

Let me rephrase....

"Weren't good enough on the day because we were crap!"

Lets not forget the Bulls have lost at least 4 decent players since the end of last season. Looking at your current team, you have some really good players, that should not be performing as bad as they currently are.

If the ref had binned every player who swung a punch after Moore lost the plot there wouldn't have been many players left.

So what about the player who appeared at the disciplinary panel, who threw a punch?