you would hate it here... sun surf... rugby league...




really though there are thousands of opportunities here ... seek them out!

and if you really want it... make it happen.

ps Agbrigg/ portobello is my origin...

I take it your condemnation extends to all those who regularly attack the people of castleford too. It's just that you seem to have forgotten to quote the hundreds of posts from wakefield fans where they have made cruel and childish remarks and chosen to respond to one of the few posts where a castleford retaliates with a like for like comment.

I do. As far as I'm aware the Stadium is the core part of the development, without which it won't go ahead!

You need to understand, there is no connection between Yorkcourt and the club. The Staddium is being built for the trust who again have no connection with the club as a business. We will just be tenants, we won't own it though we may operate it. Yorkcourt should they get past the PI and are still wanting to go with the development will build the stadium as planned regardless of Wakefields current plight.

I know it sounds odd but that is how these things work.

The revised Travel Plan is something that should have been dealt with at the original submission. It is only one part of the Inquiry terms of reference.

I doubt that the fact that Leeds City Region ( A partnership bringing together the eleven local authorities of Barnsley, Bradford, Calderdale, Craven, Harrogate, Kirklees, Leeds, Selby, Wakefield, York and North Yorkshire County Council) announcing that “Aire Valley” ( Stourton) is their preferred location for the Enterprise Zone will have much bearing on the Leeds City Council submission to PI.

- It could even bolster the position of Leeds City Council who will want to attract as much development to that area rather than seeing it lost to NM.

So, enlighten me as to any other "developments".

Thats par for the course for some of the Cas posters that contribute to the Wakey forum. They come on here as the epitome of moderation then go and spout their real feelings trying to whip up anti-wakey trash talk on the other scumbag forum they post on.

Indeed they do and Fully is one of the prime movers; his perfidiousness has been exposed several times recently by myself, G Price FC and others and as a result, he has zero credibility.

Every cloud has a silver lining though - since his multiple personalities were revealed, he posts here far less often, which is a boon.

And yet your immaturity still knows no bounds.

You've exposed nothing; only what you like to believe and more often than not construed to support your own bitter, twisted, boring arguments.

Quite possibly but it has been dealt with now and two statutory objections have been removed by resolution. These things do take time as you know... so, how are Opus getting on with the Travel Plan for Tesco on Wheldon Road? The application goes in, in just a few weeks does it not? Do you think there travel plan will be 'dealt with' prior to submission?



Well you know what thinking does for you mate... you still think that Wheldon Road has not been allocated for housing in the LDF, despite it being in black and white in the housing land supply table of the site specific LDF document. Yes, it was indeed removed as a specific housing site (as Cas and Ben Bailey originally wanted!) in favour of the whole Wheldon Road area been given SPA status but if you look in the table, right there in the housing section under 'Housing Land Supply' it says - SPA N9; Site Name, N101 Castleford Tigers Ground, Wheldon Road; Total Identified Housing Capacity, 105; 2008/09 to 2015/16, 21; 2016/17 to 2021/22, 84.

Don't forget this bit either - "The special policy areas will help meet the requirements for both housing and employment land, =#FF0000as shown in the housing land supply table in chapter 6, Housing Proposals and the employment land supply in chapter 7, Employment Proposals."

You are right, an SPA gives more flexibility to move this allocation elsewhere within the SPA, so where do you suggest they build those 105 houses instead then? Don't ask Nestle and Aeternum Capital for it to be moved to their sites because they are very likley to be leading the objections to the supermarket application... because they both want a Supermarket as well... and to be honest, I feel Aeternum Capital might have a very good case!



I feel that the days for enlightening you about anything to do with Newmarket are long gone... you have shown your true colours recently (which is a shame, because I thought you where above them) and it resides with the small 'hypocrites are us' bunch of Cas supporters who only see flaws in the Newmarket plan (which is far from perfect, but as you know I feel the positives outweigh the negatives reasonably substantially) but think that the Opus plan for Wheldon Road is perfect in every detail (despite having not actually seen it yet) and without any problems or issues at all... if only development and regeneration was that simple!

You are priceless Fully, you really are... lets looks at what you say here eh - [urlhttp://viewtopic.php?f=16&t=501399[/url... and you don't consider this even slightly bitter and twisted, despite everything and Cas almost certainly (and rightly so) being in SL next year?

As for what you like to believe, well I KNOW you only choose to believe what you want to believe while you are quite happy to ignore any information, no matter how black and white, that contradicts this belief in any way... never mind being a journalist... you should join a cult... you would be a perfect member of any cult!

That has nothing to do with being bitter. That is me stating my opinion that the article has an imbalance against licensing without offering an alternative argument. Care to differ and say it does? I am an avid believe that the licensing system does work in circumstances; it needs tweaking. As you will note, I state quite clearly that TRB makes some valid points. I then go onto make a suggestion as to how the situation could be improved to have the best of both worlds so to speak. My decision to consider not purchasing the said paper is my own beliefs based on purchasing it over the course of the last few months (and yes, I buy it every Monday religiously).

Whooosh... over you head yet again and you fail to see any irony and hypocrisy in your argument or position.

You are such a numpty and claim to be a trainee journalist, yet you don't have any idea about how print media actually works!!! The article is not a NEWS piece, it doesn't need to have any balance or even an alternative argument, because it is an OPINION based piece... this is not the BBC! Newspapers are full of them... every morning... I am sure a budding journalist like you occasionally reads a quality paper?

You fail to even understand the concept of arguing about the inclusion of the piece, which you are actually doing in this thread, which is childish and bitter at best, versus actually presenting and arguing against the points raised in TRB's opinion based article and then castigating others for being bitter and twisted in this thread!

You are genuinely unbelievable and the worst things is... you clearly and wholeheartedly think you are being balanced and reasoned in your posts, while everyone else is clearly biased!!!

To avoid any further avoidance of doubt just so you can be happy and don't have to write long winded-replies and so I am not wasting your time or any other person's for that matter. You are right, I am wrong. Everything I say, have ever said and will say will be wrong. There, everybody happy. And yes, that is me saying that I simply cannot be d any more. It's getting beyond petty; I am entitled to my opinions, I am entitled to disagree with comments and I am entitled to state what I believe. If you disagree, fine.

Thanks IA,

Maybe Big Alf will come back and accept what I wrote was factually correct.

Where in this thread?

Only "Sesquipedalian" has claimed to have written facts.

When are you ever going to learn? once again IA has made you look,to use his term a numpty, and a right one at that, so much so that you have had one almighty hissy fit and rivalled him as to who made you look more stupid, him or you, your problem is that your opinions are based on other peoples and look ridiculous against people like IA who deals in facts and experience mainly, and fwiw your the one showing petulance nobody else, the good thing for you is you hopefully you will grow out of it with maturity hth.

Wow!!

Don't know what the chin scratchings all about, there's no secret about who I am!

This is what I'm referring to,

He seems fairly chilled and rational to me - can't you handle the truth?

My thoughts too.

Finally getting to him is it?

I tried answering that point in my post that I_A turned into a rant against the WR plans, and me personally.

For what its worth my answer to you is :

The travel plan will be a positive if/when accepted by the Inspector.
The Enterprize Zone could be a negative as I stated.

Sorry if I confused you with another poster.

As a Fev fan, I kinda feel left out of the Newmarket vs Glasshoughton debate.... so I'd like to share with you a couple of impressions of what the new Featherstone ground will look like come 2013... And impressions here www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3371 www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3372 Keep in mind that these have been done by the fans, so they aren't architect qualiteh.

As a Fev fan, I kinda feel left out of the Newmarket vs Glasshoughton debate.... so I'd like to share with you a couple of impressions of what the new Featherstone ground will look like come 2013... And impressions here www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3371 www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3372 Keep in mind that these have been done by the fans, so they aren't architect qualiteh.

Quote ="mattj13"As a Fev fan, I kinda feel left out of the Newmarket vs Glasshoughton debate.... so I'd like to share with you a couple of impressions of what the new Featherstone ground will look like come 2013... And impressions here www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3371 www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3372 Keep in mind that these have been done by the fans, so they aren't architect qualiteh.'" so where do you put the pile of rubble that you want ?

Quote ="mattj13"As a Fev fan, I kinda feel left out of the Newmarket vs Glasshoughton debate.... so I'd like to share with you a couple of impressions of what the new Featherstone ground will look like come 2013... And impressions here www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3371 www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3372 Keep in mind that these have been done by the fans, so they aren't architect qualiteh.'" so where do you put the pile of rubble that you want ?

Under the 2 stands at either end of the ground, we need it for the hardcore.

you can have ours when the new stand gets done

Quote ="mattj13"As a Fev fan, I kinda feel left out of the Newmarket vs Glasshoughton debate.... so I'd like to share with you a couple of impressions of what the new Featherstone ground will look like come 2013... And impressions here www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3371 www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3372 Looks good I can't wait for Newmarket to be sorted watching the mighty Trin in our new stadium will be a dream come true if it hadnt been called in we wouldn't be in the position were in now Keep in mind that these have been done by the fans, so they aren't architect qualiteh.'"

Quote ="mattj13"As a Fev fan, I kinda feel left out of the Newmarket vs Glasshoughton debate.... so I'd like to share with you a couple of impressions of what the new Featherstone ground will look like come 2013... And impressions here www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3371 www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... ch_id=3372 Looks good I can't wait for Newmarket to be sorted watching the mighty Trin in our new stadium will be a dream come true if it hadnt been called in we wouldn't be in the position were in now Keep in mind that these have been done by the fans, so they aren't architect qualiteh.'"