Agree, Judas is a class player and Kear knows that and always brought the best out of him..It just went Pete Tong after his move, he will play very well with Broughy..Good signing for Wakey and believe me he will be MOM every time you play KR

[url=http://www.sporthull.co.uk/headlines/HULL-KR-EXCLUSIVE-Cooke-agrees-join-rivals/article-1898017-detail/article.htmlHull Press Claims Cooke To WTW.[/url

You would have to imagine that Cooke will be used at 13 with Latu reverting to Hooker for the season at least.

Danny Brough won't be moving anywhere until his contract is up unless we've received a large transfer fee. And that seems unlikely from Hull KR considering their financial problems

6.jeffries
7.brough
13.cooke
good combinatins there plenty of creativity and a good kicking game there good signing for you lot i think

He may go a little easier on FC now when he plays us !!

Unless your Briscoe, Fox, Welham, Colbon, Murrell, Netherton, Watts, Wheeldon etc...

Another biased slant on the story by a B&W.

Morgan doesn't have an aussie bias, he just doesn't get along with Cooke. For what ever reason he has never really fitted in with JM's plans and a move to wakey may be what he needs to reignite his form which for us has been only seen in small doses.

Ok well I wont hijack the Trinity board and get into a debate about it so we will leave that there.
I did notice though you didnt dispute my fact about all thats needed to get the best out of Cookie was a 'good' coach who knows what he's doing !!!

this will add a lot to the squad imho , i will judge cooke on performances and behaviour whilst at our club ... i along with many got taught a lesson when we signed Moore and the other bad boys.

Can clauses be put in loan contracts for example Cooke not being be allowed to play at the weekend against Rovers ?
As much as Morgan wanted rid of Cookie I bet he never had the balls not to put one in if he can.

All loan deals between SL clubs have clauses in them that prevent playing against parent clubs. I don't expect Cooke's to be any different (and I'm still awaiting proper confirmation of a deal, as the HDM is less accurate than Viz when facts are involved).

That's not true Hull had Nick Scruton on loan from Leeds a few years back and not only did he play against them he scored against them

That's your clue.

Could be a really good signing at Wakefield or could be a case of too many cooks (no pun intended!!!) and fall out with Brough over who is marshalling the side.

Will definately assist with distribution for sure

korkis on loan from hudds for a season, he played on Saturday. Explain that one

Baddum tisch !!!

If it's true, then his position is the only issue of debate. He is a quality player. Am I right in thinking that his signing for Rovers was a board decision taken without Morgan's input, which may explain something? You wouldn't want to leave BJ out or Brough, and so loose forward has to be the preferred option. I know he used to play there sometimes at Hull FC, and now at Rovers (or is it "back then"?). If so, we would now have a strong set of props, plus some quick and mobile second row and loose options, with Johnson, Ferguson, JD, Morrisson, and Cooke.

If someone is injured he may play in the half's

Ainscough can't play against Wigan, explain that one

So maybe it has to be drawn up into the contract and it isnt a gernal rule about not being able to play against your parent club ??!?!
Who knows, but I bet your hoping he doesnt play !!

It would be a matter of agreement between the two clubs, depending on how much the club receiving the player needs him. Wigan want game time for Ainscough, and he was getting it elsewhere, and so Wigan had the upper hand in the agreement.

I'd suggest that it's something to be decided by the clubs,don't think it's a Super league rule that you can't play against your parent club,more a case of not wanting the loaned out player coming back and biting you on the a$se!!!

And we according to some will be paying some of Cookes wage, if that is the case he won't be playing against us

You wont be paying all of his wages or there is no point loaning him out in the first place.
It may well be around half each or a slightly larger portion paid by Trinity !

Who mentioned paying all of his wage?

They have Newtons wage spare, i assume he will take that and we will make up the shortfall. A small price to pay to get rid

I have no idea so just please just ignore my last !!!