One, maybe two wins at best in that. Reckon AG won't get his 9 wins target.

Don't agree, as if beating Cas and Salford aren't also realistic targets and I'd like to think we're with a good shout at Hull KR & Hudds.

Hudds we could feel a backlash,Leeds depends who turns up,Cas did us at home lets not forget,Saints only just got the win over Widnes,HKR probs to strong for us,Widnes have improved just lost v saints,Salford away nearly did us at home and could be a case of need a win to make the 8.
We could end up with zilch from those games left more so when you think of our defending.

On paper and on recent form will will not win another game. I want to see the remaining 7 games used to give some of the better performing reserves a game or two. I am not saying 5 or 6 at a time but certainly 2 a week. Walshaw and Trout have shown what they can do and they need more game time. Anakin must play, otherwise whats the point. Wildie needs to play and god forbid we ever get to see if Ellis can play.

Didn't we once play Shudds when they'd lost about 1 million games on the trot and they still wupped our asses?

When a team is usually on a losing run, they always seem to spank us e.g London away.

yes they had lost about there first 7 or 8 games and we had started quite well then we went to there place on a friday night and they battered us.

we will be lucky if we win one game we cant defend,,,hudds leeds saints kr salford not a prey other two a chance but thats all at this current time

2006. They had lost thier first 7 games and we had won 5 of our first 7 and were flying high.

We lost 56 - 12.

I still don't agree with playing the kids to see how they go.
We should put out the best team possible every week and try to win every game.

At the moment, Trout is getting in on merit, so is Walshaw but is behind Trout for me as a Second Row.
If injuries happen or form dips for a particular player then so be it, but not for the sake of it. As much as it might motivate the kid, it will demotivate the others. He will be doing what some already accuse him of and that is picking favourites. He should pick on form alone.

I am not saying play them for the sake of it. The first team have had a very poor season, 6 wins is it, yet nobody ever gets dropped, to be letting in 30 points a match must mean that players who get selected week after week are not doing what they are paid to do. Several of the reseve team players have played very well all season and yet they never get a sniff a first team. It must be difficult for them to not think whats the point and look for another club. We need to show the first team players that if you can be dropped and the reseves must be rewarded for good play. An example would be Mathers who has made at least one error per game for the last five games that has gifted a try. Grayson in the second team has had a great season, give the lad a run out. Southern has been very poor all season, Anakin has been great in the reserves and Speirs has impressed on loan, give them a go. Mellars has been gash all season, Cowling has played realy well, give Cowling a go. Wood has been shocking lets give Wildie or Ellis a run out. We now know that Wood is never going to be good enough lets find out if Wildie / Ellis can do a better job.

R.A. should be using James, Ellis, Walshaw, L.Smith in all the remaining games IMO. On current form we'll not win another game this season.

Why?

They need a chance to "see how they go"

No point having reserves and no point busting a gut to be ignored.

May as well pack Anakin/Wildie/Ellis off then, if they don't deserve a shot, lets face it plus 30 points every game what have they got to lose.

Totally agree !!!!

Therefore drop Mathers and Wood for starters

Last year, we had 7 wins. We have to have 10 this year to be acceptable.

Is that 7 matches left then we see the back of Agar

Can only see the one win and that's the last game and that can't come soon enough.

Yeah.

It will be a disappointing end to a disappointing season. Players massively underperforming, glad when it just fizzles out with no doubt a complete lack of desire and effort.

Wrencat, I honestly think it will only be 1.
Home to Widnes.
Our defence is so poor that I don't believe we'll win any other.
So come on lads............prove me wrong

All the above has been debated etc. several times already.
I agree with you but, as we all now know, its not gonna happen. Starting 17 will be more or less the same for the last 7 as it was the last 7 played. Just tweaked for injuries. Agar in todays express, and i quote "I would rather develop the players we already have", yet when both our centres are injured what do we do ? Promote someone from u-19? No, loan someone from Leeds

2 points is all we will get, the way we ate playing; Widnes home..if we are lucky.

Sorry but I think thats a lot of linking of wishful thinking. Cas and Salford ought to be realistic targets but the way we defend and throw away possession, we are always lucky to win. Cas away...they slammed us once this year and Wheldon Jungle is a graveyard at the best of times for Wakey. Salford in great form. HullKR and Huddersfied just too good for us. Widnes not good away,,2 points. AGAR OUT ASAP come the end of the season, I would hope but not holding my breath. Seems we are committed to seeing out our compromise coach's contract. Great - we seem to ne getting Newmarket. 2 years of a shambles on the pitch if we keep Agar...it gives me very strange mixed feelings.

asmadasa wrote:R.A. should be using James, Ellis, Walshaw, [uL.Smith[/u in all the remaining games IMO. On current form we'll not win another game this season.


I know L.Smith is from Leeds on loan but on form he is a quality player and if he shows some form and WTW can keep onto him then he'll be a good signing. He'll need game time.

Is Lee Smith any better than our u-19 centres ? And even if he is, why bother bringing him in for 8 games of a season thats lost, why not try said u-19's ?