So goes the rumour on our board.

Anyone heard owt?

It's been alluded to and it would make sense given his lack of game time. It certainly would spice up the middle 8 encounter.

Player exchange with Walshaw?!

We'll do you a straight swap for Walshaw or Gaskell

I heard he could be heading back there a couple of weeks back but it was for next season. Maybe it has been brought forward.

You'll have to get some players of the books to afford his wages

Sorry ... We have got rid of the suits running the club intent on Suicide

Not sure who we would swap for him if it was a player swap. We have recently signed Crossley, so maybe a prop but not sure who or why we would. Only one I could think of is Lauaki who hasn't played recently but he's been in the Bulls TV videos so that would suggest he is staying. All other players have been regulars.

Think it maybe a case of Sammut being unhappy, Webster doesn't want an unhappy player he doesn't rate andyway and wants some free cash. Would expect Wakey have a player lined up rather than a player swap.
No way would they let a player go to a rival without having someone lined up themselves.

Would be very happy if we signed him!

Perhaps a straight swap for Siejka... he's injured until July but that's when Webster intends on taking things seriously anyway isn't it?



In all seriousness he'd probably get a good reception back at the Bulls where his performances were mainly good with the odd brain fart game thrown in. His move to Wakefield has been a bit of disaster for him so I could understand if was keen to move on.

He's in our squad for Sunday.

And Annakin as well. Webster whines about injuries and sends two fit players out on loan. They might've been not as fit as other players but playing SL would do them better.

Haven't heard Webster whine!

He does say Annakin needs game time to be match fit...so fair enough, with not having a reserve grade to bring him back through.

Or should we play unfit players and risk further injuries?

It's not Sammut's position we are struggling in.

Really ?, it seems to me that we are trying everyone at stand off apart from the one natural stand off that we have.

Agreed.
Webster obviously has a problem with Sammut although selling him to Bradford may just cost us later in the year.
Finally, for a club that is not blessed with cash, it seems crazy to be paying someone who we are not prepared to play, it's just odd.

Think we need another forward to replace Sammut who is stealing a wage sat on the touch line. Let Bradford have him back and get a front row forward who runs through onto the ball with pace and tackles hard. They've got about 8 props now.

I was meaning in terms of injury rather than form.

Regardless, whatever Sammut is doing in training is not enough.

How half hearted must he be, to get in a team as poor as Wakey.

Personally, I'd like him to play...in friendlies he looked great...but, something is not right with him.

Well, I'm sorry but if you're the coach of Wakefield Trinity you do not have the luxury of sulking if it means a talented player has to sit it out!

We do not have the resources and simply cannot afford for our head coach to refuse point blank to pick a player because they don't get on!

If he's fit and available he should be played!

I understand it's more a case of a sulking player, rather than a sulking coach.

If as a coach, I thought a player would improve my chances of a win, I'd pick him.

I thought his defence was not up to the team's standards. I guess that could mean if he played he might show the rest up because I doubt it can be worse than we have currently.

He'd have to be scoring 'own try's' similar to own goals in football!

It's actually not possible in RL but to be worse than what we're currently getting he'd have to find a way to do it!

Sammut won't be at Bradford this season, they are full up on their cap and would have to shift two or three good players to be able to accommodate him

Well I'm not as informed as you appear to be re our salary cap but if we needed to shift 2/3 good players to sign him then I wouldn't bother personally. I like Sammut but I wouldn't be paying him silly money, just how big a contract did you offer him?

If Webster won't play him, but you cannot afford to sign anyone while he remains it doesn't leave Wakefield in a strong negotiating position. He'd be a useful addition for Bradford but with Mullaney back, we aren't desperate for a 6/7 at this moment.

Quote ="Tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/

Quote ="Tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/

Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'"

Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'"

Quote ="tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'" Oh dear yet another blinding revelation from our friendly WTW correspondent from across the common

Quote ="tigerade"I doubt very much he won't be going anywhere near London again and I can't imagine WTW letting him.'" Quote ="Wildthing"Sammut in the 19 man squad for London V Hunslet tomorrow; www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/hen ... slet-game/'" Oh dear yet another blinding revelation from our friendly WTW correspondent from across the common

Yep, he even sent me a PM with some potentially libelous and obviously made up rubbish as
to why he wouldn't ever play for London again.
Complete troll.