Thought we looked like a clueless bunch of kids with some of the errors. How we are still in the game is a miracle.

If that's a team that wants to win such an important game I would hate to see them play if they didn't care.

According to cummins Leeds 3rd try was a obstruction should not have stood ! So we should be going in 12 12

Wish people who didn’t know owt about rugby would knock it on head I.e Eastern wildcat, Chissitt, Wilzay, Egg Banjo

?

You've named a old player there matey!

I don’t disagree yet we gifted them the second with Randall’s shocking pass and the third should have never have been, the penalty against Reece was a joke and the tj told hicks he thought Reece might have been obstructed from making the tackle by moon but hicks didn’t go upstairs.

He has also allowed Leeds to get away with murder at the ruck when defending

Its a question whos worse hicks or wakey

Your support

I'll settle for the draw after we went 18-6 down, especially with that shocker of a pass from Randell.

The result in general shows how shat Leeds are, if we had any idea we would have been home and dry by ht.

So does this mean we now definitely need a win? Draw another and can be caught by Leeds? Can’t see Leeds losing to Widnes or Salford.

Slightly off topic but we'll beat FC next week.

A draw should do it as we've got a decent PD, a win would remove all doubt. Still got a lot to do against 2 decent teams

1 point may be enough as we have a good points difference

3 times start of the second half we had them on the rack and give possession up cheaply, although how the Pauli one wasn’t a pen to us for Leeds interference I don’t know. In fact they got away with murder at the ruck all game slowing it right down

Yeah, I've no idea what the penalty against Pauli was for.

The hall ball steal was a stone cold knock on as well which enabled them to stretch the lead to 8 points

It is a good result and hopefully we be the catalyst to finish with at least one win out of the last two.

Leeds fans whinging about woods try. Am I the only one who didn’t think it wasn’t an obvious no try

It wasn't an obvious try from all angles, but the final freeze frame on the replay looked to be try.

But when the ion field decision is a try imo not enough evidence to overturn it yet they are going on like it was an obvious knock on

It was a decision that went against Leeds, so of course it was a try, as much as Justin Ryders a few years back.

No complaints about Hicks. He gave us a couple of dodgy ones, and gave Leeds a couple of dodgy ones. Wood's try was a knock-on any day of the week. If that goes up as a decision without an on-field call, it gets ruled out.

We played some dumb stuff and got more out of the game than we deserved. For all the online coaches on here slating Finn, we didn't half miss his directing of the game. We looked clueless too often and we needed his direction.

As it happens, we played well for ten minutes, and that might be enough to spur us on. Unless Leeds get two big wins, a draw should suffice now.

As an aside, even if we end up in the qualifiers, I think we'll be the team that gets through it unscathed.

Ash Handley would have run rings round Finn tonight.
Would Finn have put the delicate kick in that Hall had to kick dead?
Finn is not a dry track player, he's a mudbath player.

Are you sure? Our home record against them is a little scratchy to say the least.
Tonight's result doesn't much to calm the nerves that's for sure.

On a side note, Wood must start next week and at Hudds.