ffs www.rugby-league.com/article/380 ... rs-charged

ffs www.rugby-league.com/article/380 ... rs-charged

Quote ="deeHell"ffs www.rugby-league.com/article/380 ... rs-charged'" Honestly carnt see anything wrong with the tackle, 41 minutes and 10 seconds of the game

Quote ="deeHell"ffs www.rugby-league.com/article/380 ... rs-charged'" Honestly carnt see anything wrong with the tackle, 41 minutes and 10 seconds of the game

Just looked at it myself, I can't see any contact with the head if any its a slight brush. It's almost like he's been targeted. If I was him I would go through some kind of grievance procedure against the RFL as basis for further legal action. If this victimisation continues it's going to seriously impact his career in a negative way. Good new is that it's only a grade A so no more than a 1 match ban and back for the semi.

Getting ridiculous, if found guilty 3 game ban - yet loughlin nearly kills some one with a deliberate straight arm but gets a single game - guess chester shouldn't have told the disciplinary a few home truths

Yeah I wouldn't count on it being only one match.

Say what you want about Koukash but he was right about one thing - The RFL are not fit for purpose. The entire organisation needs dismantling and starting from scratch.

No they are a complete joke.

Shouldn't Taylor be up for is late shot on the advertising board near the end.

We were discussing the likes of Sio and Ashurst been rested for this one, can't see it now.

With Howarth out on loan, do we have any other options for 9.

Isn't one of our new signings from the academy an 9, if so, is he ready

No they are a complete joke.

Shouldn't Taylor be up for is late shot on the advertising board near the end.

We were discussing the likes of Sio and Ashurst been rested for this one, can't see it now.

With Howarth out on loan, do we have any other options for 9.

Isnt one of our new signings from the academy an 9, if so, is he ready

I forgot to tape it! Is there anywhere I can watch the offending tackle????

Not that it is going to make much difference but ....

I don't get the uproar. I like Moore a lot but you can hardly say they pick on him. He keeps doing things they can't fail to pick up.

I agree the penalties he gets are not in line with everyone else but the SOL case proves the point. He got away with it because he showed he was a nice guy and didn't mean it.
That ship sailed for Moore a looking time ago.

Personally hope he gets one game. He's our most important player attacking wise IMO and he'd be nice and fresh for the semi and fired up as he thinks the RFL are out to get him. If he gets more than one though then I will make sure the members of the disciplinary panel do not enjoy the rest of their lives.

yes but the advertising hoarding was in wakefield colours so it doesn't count

personally hope he gets zero ban , perhaps its time the club sat down watched every game and gave the disciplinary a spurious set of attacks and breaches on wakefield players after every game

RFL do what they do cos we let them get away with it - time and time again we see how they take a different attitude to the "big name players playing for big clubs"

TBH having watched the loughlin tackle and the moore one i feel there is no comparison - mannikin should have sued o loughlin for assault - I d have paid the legal cost myself if he had wanted to

personally hope he gets zero ban , perhaps its time the club sat down watched every game and gave the disciplinary a spurious set of attacks and breaches on wakefield players after every game

RFL do what they do cos we let them get away with it - time and time again we see how they take a different attitude to the "big name players playing for big clubs"

TBH having watched the loughlin tackle and the moore one i feel there is no comparison - mannikin should have sued o loughlin for assault - I d have paid the legal cost myself if he had wanted to

You are pretty much spot on here Kirmudgeonly.

I have said before on here that if a coach or a chairman has any gripe with either a referee, or the MRP, then with freedom of speech, there should be no reason as to why a team can't lodge an official complaint without the risk of a fine.

Maybe to do it in writing rather than a rant after the game, or on social media.

At the end of the day, liveliehoods, and player welfare is at stake

Brad Moules? he's a 9. That would be some game to be thrown into on Sunday and possibly the semi. Was impressed with him when I've seen him though

Give over, SOL isn't a nice guy he's been a cheap shot merchant all his career. As for Moore, again give over he's no worse than the rest, why should he have to modify his game to suit the RFL bottlers. There is being reasonable Pops and just plain appeasing!



Is there any footage?

How very true Vasty, that was my next post, he's been getting away with cheap shots for years more noticeable now he's getting on

Exactly. Makes it even harder to swallow when such as Moore get picked up for every misdemeanour.

Quote ="vastman"Give over, SOL isn't a nice guy he's been a cheap shot merchant all his career. As for Moore, again give over he's no worse than the rest, why should he have to modify his game to suit the RFL bottlers. There is being reasonable Pops and just plain appeasing! [size=150Is there any footage?[/size'" try this https://t.co/LMbxIE2BN2

Quote ="vastman"Give over, SOL isn't a nice guy he's been a cheap shot merchant all his career. As for Moore, again give over he's no worse than the rest, why should he have to modify his game to suit the RFL bottlers. There is being reasonable Pops and just plain appeasing! [size=150Is there any footage?[/size'" try this https://t.co/LMbxIE2BN2

Having just seen that footage, it's a penalty, end of. If that is a disciplinary case then every head high tackle is and if he gets a ban then every single head high shot should be. I what world do they live if they think blokes playing a damn hard physical game are not going to get a tackle wrong from time to time in 30 degree heat having just put in a massive shift as we had been on the back foot for 20 minutes. They played the game. It is funny the understanding they gave O'Loughlin for what looked like a deliberate intention to injure to me, yet they call this in for what looks like a clumsy challenge. As I say, every head high tackle = a ban if this is the case. Is this what we want for the game? Scores of players out on bans? Though I am giving them more fairness than it's due to be honest. It is bent and we know it is. Who do they think they are kidding. If Moore gets any kind of a ban, especially one that keeps him out of the semi, then I will attend games at Wakefield as I won't let the club suffer, I won't cut my own nose off and not go to the semi or final should we get there, but I will attend no RFL events of any kind ever again until this fiasco is sorted out and I would urge all fans of all clubs to do the same until it is. Only empty grounds for internationals and Grand Finals will make them listen. I am serious. I have heard this off the fans of many clubs. It is not just us. It is time for big demonstrations and action. I can't support a game that is so blatantly bent any more

Penalty? - yes. Ban? - no.

I did not tape the game but as I remember is it the one where he sort of comes from behind and tackles him over the shoulder. If so like you say, every head shot in the game should be given a match ban. This is totally ridiculous

Quote ="1873"try this https://t.co/LMbxIE2BN2'" Is that it, seriously - surely penalty sufficient.

Quote ="1873"try this https://t.co/LMbxIE2BN2'" Is that it, seriously - surely penalty sufficient.

See worse than that every week on the televised games. Moore must be totally ticked off

Not sure how it all works but it says grade A 0 to 1 game. No guilty plea available. Unless you get extra for pleading not guilty he may as well fight this one as he is going to get a one game ban in any event.